Hi,
I'm having problems with CODI 0.9.2 on Glassfish 3.1.
When trying to deploy my app, I receive the following exception:
[#|2011-01-17T12:08:24.958+0100|SEVERE|glassfish3.1|javax.enterprise.system.tools.admin.org.glassfish.deployment.admin|_ThreadID=85;_ThreadName=http-thread-pool-4
and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/1/17 Dominik Dorn
> Hi,
>
> I'm having problems with CODI 0.9.2 on Glassfish 3.1.
> When trying to deploy my app, I receive the following exception:
>
>
>
>
> [#|2011-01-17T12:08
ass is the problem for Weld, who knows...
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Mon, 1/17/11, Gerhard wrote:
> From: Gerhard
> Subject: Re: Problems with CODI 0.9.2 on Glassfish 3.1
> To: "MyFaces Discussion"
> Date: Monday, January 17, 2011, 12:13 PM
> hi dominik,
>
> v0.9.2 is te
is should be available.
>
> Btw, I gonna rename this to LoggerProducer, drop the final and make it
> public. Maybe the missing 'public' on the class is the problem for Weld, who
> knows...
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Mon, 1/17/11, Gerhard wrote:
>
>>
> Subject: Re: Problems with CODI 0.9.2 on Glassfish 3.1
> To: "MyFaces Discussion"
> Date: Monday, January 17, 2011, 12:25 PM
> Will try with 3.0.1 then. hopefully
> it works there.
> Will report back soon.
>
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Mark Struberg
&g
eld, who
>> knows...
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>> --- On Mon, 1/17/11, Gerhard wrote:
>>
>>> From: Gerhard
>>> Subject: Re: Problems with CODI 0.9.2 on Glassfish 3.1
>>> To: "MyFaces Discussion"
>>> Date: Mo
so this should be available.
> >>
> >> Btw, I gonna rename this to LoggerProducer, drop the final and make it
> public. Maybe the missing 'public' on the class is the problem for Weld, who
> knows...
> >>
> >> LieGrue,
> >>
canner?
Anyway, I'll make the producer public for the future.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Mon, 1/17/11, Dominik Dorn wrote:
> From: Dominik Dorn
> Subject: Re: Problems with CODI 0.9.2 on Glassfish 3.1
> To: "MyFaces Discussion"
> Date: Monday, January 17, 2011, 12:49 PM
classes to the classpath scanner?
>
> Anyway, I'll make the producer public for the future.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> --- On Mon, 1/17/11, Dominik Dorn wrote:
>
> > From: Dominik Dorn
> > Subject: Re: Problems with CODI 0.9.2 on Glassfish 3.1
> >
:
> From: Dominik Dorn
> Subject: Re: Problems with CODI 0.9.2 on Glassfish 3.1
> To: "MyFaces Discussion"
> Date: Monday, January 17, 2011, 12:49 PM
> Ok, it works now with glassfish
> 3.0.1
>
> however, codi adds request params and a window id to every
>
>
>> From: Dominik Dorn
>> Subject: Re: Problems with CODI 0.9.2 on Glassfish 3.1
>> To: "MyFaces Discussion"
>> Date: Monday, January 17, 2011, 12:49 PM
>> Ok, it works now with glassfish
>> 3.0.1
>>
>> however, codi adds request param
gt; From the point of the CDI spec there is nothing against this pattern. So
> it might be a glassfish CDI-integration issue which needs to be reported
> over there.
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> > --- On Mon, 1/17/11, Dominik Dorn wrote:
> >
> &g
;> core/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces/extensions/cdi/core/impl/logging/InstanceProducer.java
>> >>
>> >> so this should be available.
>> >>
>> >> Btw, I gonna rename this to LoggerProducer, drop the final and make it
>> public. Maybe the
dominik, matze
Can you please file a jiraffe for this?
Seems we need to dig a bit deeper to cover prettyfaces compatibility as well.
txs and LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 1/18/11, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> From: Matthias Wessendorf
> Subject: Re: Problems with CODI 0.9.2 on Glassfi
11, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
>> From: Matthias Wessendorf
>> Subject: Re: Problems with CODI 0.9.2 on Glassfish 3.1
>> To: "MyFaces Discussion"
>> Date: Tuesday, January 18, 2011, 10:18 AM
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:20 PM,
>> Gerhard
>>
need to dig a bit deeper to cover prettyfaces compatibility as well.
>>
>>
>> txs and LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>> --- On Tue, 1/18/11, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>
>>> From: Matthias Wessendorf
>>> Subject: Re: Problems with CODI 0.9.2 on Gla
16 matches
Mail list logo
