RE: [Trinidad] PPR related question

2008-07-03 Thread Justin mcKay
up of the scope it's just a bit of unfortunate overhead. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Wessendorf Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 7:58 AM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: [Trinidad] PPR related question Hi, here is a lit

Re: [Trinidad] PPR related question

2008-07-03 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi, here is a little bit on the same topic: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/2008/03/11/dynamic-tables-and-orchestras-conversation-scope/ it also explains, why you want larger than request, but short than session. Trinidad's processScope fixes that (so does the conversation scope that is o

Re: [Trinidad] PPR related question

2008-07-03 Thread Simon Lessard
Hi, Yes, you need to use a larger scope than request for your use case. What happen more specifically is the following: 1. Click the checkbox; 2. PPR launches and set the request managed bean's check property to true; 3. The inputTexts are rerendered; 4. The managed bean is destroyed as the reque