Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-06 Thread Werner Punz
Matthias Wessendorf wrote: hi, But I see xdoclet not as the tool to cover all, it is more a tool to give you a good headstart and manages for you the error ridden gruntwork yes, one of the main points of xdoclet is to generate the tld ;) In the past there were twotimes or so an error that

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-05 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
hi, > But I see xdoclet not as the tool to cover all, it is more a tool to > give you a good headstart and manages for you the error ridden gruntwork yes, one of the main points of xdoclet is to generate the tld ;) In the past there were twotimes or so an error that a strict container (was it we

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-05 Thread Werner Punz
Jiri Zaloudek wrote: Hi Martin, when I have implemented WML RenderKit, I have created a XDoclet modul. I can say, that use Xdoclet was very good decision. From one description file Xdoclet generates component and render classes, tld description file and faces-config. It's very helpful, but in the

RE: Google Open Source

2005-06-05 Thread Jiri Zaloudek
hether the user can leave the input field blank or not. Default is "false" * * @wapfaces.attribute * valueBinding="true" */ boolean emptyok; ... } Regards, Jiri Zaloudek > -Original Message- > From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-04 Thread Werner Punz
Martin Marinschek wrote: Interesting! as for the code generation issue: are you aware that there is some code generation available in MyFaces? The component getters and setters, as well as the state saving, can automatically be generated... how? except via eclipse, does not really matter, t

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-04 Thread Martin Marinschek
I would say this license is still compatible - essentially, there are no restrictions except for not being able to advertise with Sun's name, that should be alright I'd say. regards, Martin On 6/3/05, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Marinschek wrote: > > > Principally, the BSD a

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-04 Thread Martin Marinschek
Interesting! as for the code generation issue: are you aware that there is some code generation available in MyFaces? The component getters and setters, as well as the state saving, can automatically be generated... It might be interesting, though, to generate more than just the component - are y

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-03 Thread Werner Punz
Martin Marinschek wrote: Ok, I updated the proposals to include two AJAX ones, due to your feedback, and included a proposal for JavaScript - but note again that JSF can only work with disabled JavaScript if you use ServerSide state saving and for navigation - use commandButtons inside forms, whi

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-03 Thread Werner Punz
Martin Marinschek wrote: Ok, I updated the proposals to include two AJAX ones, due to your feedback, and included a proposal for JavaScript - but note again that JSF can only work with disabled JavaScript if you use ServerSide state saving and for navigation - use commandButtons inside forms, whi

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-03 Thread Werner Punz
Martin Marinschek wrote: Principally, the BSD and the ASL are compatible (there are problems with the GPL, though). So it should be no problem to take over the respective code sections, if you keep the license information with the code. As soon as we take over code into the MyFaces codebase, w

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-03 Thread Werner Punz
Martin Marinschek wrote: Principally, the BSD and the ASL are compatible (there are problems with the GPL, though). So it should be no problem to take over the respective code sections, if you keep the license information with the code. As soon as we take over code into the MyFaces codebase, w

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-03 Thread Martin Marinschek
Principally, the BSD and the ASL are compatible (there are problems with the GPL, though). So it should be no problem to take over the respective code sections, if you keep the license information with the code. As soon as we take over code into the MyFaces codebase, we will need to decide whata

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-03 Thread Werner Punz
The stuff we are discussing here, Sun has the Blueprints project which gives code examples for certain things, the last two weeks they released code examples for certain ajax JSF controls under a BSD style license (no liability you can use this code as is, keep the headers intact leave a file with

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-03 Thread Martin Marinschek
Ok, I updated the proposals to include two AJAX ones, due to your feedback, and included a proposal for JavaScript - but note again that JSF can only work with disabled JavaScript if you use ServerSide state saving and for navigation - use commandButtons inside forms, which you might try to style t

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-03 Thread Martin Marinschek
I don't quite understand you - you want to include berkley style license code into MyFaces? Which blueprints do you mean? regards, Martin On 6/3/05, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Question to all more knowledgable, I am currently migrating the > autocomplete stuff into myfaces (which

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-03 Thread Werner Punz
Question to all more knowledgable, I am currently migrating the autocomplete stuff into myfaces (which I have to do for my project anyway), as far as I could see, the blueprints are handled in a Berkley Style license. I would love to dump the stuff under the Apache2 license onto the sourceforge

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-02 Thread Martin Marinschek
Yes, we would definitely have a look over the plate with this student, and then implement what is best for MyFaces and works well in other platforms! regards, Martin On 6/2/05, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also like the Ajax stuff. > > I noticed ajaxfaces.com, they are usi

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-02 Thread b0nyb0y
Another vote for AJAX.. On 6/3/05, David Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AJAX PLEASE (my two pesos) > >

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-02 Thread David Thompson
AJAX PLEASE (my two pesos) On 6/2/05, Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Original Message- > > What about your suggestions? Would you be interested in mentoring? > > -/Original Message- > > How about writing a component or enhance datatable to do this: >

RE: Google Open Source

2005-06-02 Thread Jesse Alexander (KBSA 21)
-Original Message- What about your suggestions? Would you be interested in mentoring? -/Original Message- How about writing a component or enhance datatable to do this: (earlier mail in the user-list): -cited- Hi All, I find it very surprising that all the JSF Datamodels

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-02 Thread Werner Punz
Matthias Wessendorf wrote: cool https://bpcatalog.dev.java.net/ajax/jsf-ajax/ (and related) is new! Ajax and BPCatalog I also saw before. cool stuff, starting a print session tomorrow. Werner, have you looked at http://www.ajaxfaces.com ? Just a note ;) Ah yes another nifty stuff, I dumped

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-02 Thread Werner Punz
Matthias Wessendorf wrote: cool https://bpcatalog.dev.java.net/ajax/jsf-ajax/ (and related) is new! Ajax and BPCatalog I also saw before. cool stuff, starting a print session tomorrow. Werner, have you looked at http://www.ajaxfaces.com ? Nope, is it good?

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
cool https://bpcatalog.dev.java.net/ajax/jsf-ajax/ (and related) is new! Ajax and BPCatalog I also saw before. cool stuff, starting a print session tomorrow. Werner, have you looked at http://www.ajaxfaces.com ? Just a note ;) On 6/2/05, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, of cours

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-02 Thread Werner Punz
Sorry, of course, I forgot... https://bpcatalog.dev.java.net/nonav/ajax/ https://bpcatalog.dev.java.net/ajax/jsf-ajax/ https://bpcatalog.dev.java.net/ajax/autocomplete-jsf/index.html https://bpcatalog.dev.java.net/ajax/autocomplete-jsf/design https://bpcatalog.dev.java.net/source/browse/bpcatalog/

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-02 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I also like the Ajax stuff. I noticed ajaxfaces.com, they are using a serval servlet for their ajax stuff; similar to my first JSF_AJAX_TEST, since JSF request (*.jsf) goes to the pages that contains the jsf components (default...) :) Note, that Shale has a *remote* facility with handles all *.re

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-02 Thread Enrique Medina
Please, count with another huge YES for AJAX ;-) 2005/6/2, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hey guys & girls, > > have you read about that Google Summer-of-code initiative > (http://code.google.com/summerofcode.html)? > > I have several (exactly 4 students) who would love to take part in

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-02 Thread Werner Punz
Martin Marinschek wrote: Hey guys & girls, have you read about that Google Summer-of-code initiative (http://code.google.com/summerofcode.html)? I have several (exactly 4 students) who would love to take part in this initiative, so all we would need to have would be 4 small projects they could

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-02 Thread Martin Marinschek
Can you post the links to this stuff? regards, Martin On 6/2/05, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Marinschek wrote: > > If we can't take it over, we could at least take the hints from there ;) > > > > regards, > > > > Martin > > > exactly my point, I just wanted to give hints on w

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-02 Thread Werner Punz
Martin Marinschek wrote: If we can't take it over, we could at least take the hints from there ;) regards, Martin exactly my point, I just wanted to give hints on where to find that stuff, currently there is a sideproject with good documentation regarding ajaxed jsf components going on in th

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-02 Thread Martin Marinschek
If we can't take it over, we could at least take the hints from there ;) regards, Martin On 6/2/05, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Neal Haggard wrote: > > We would love to see the AJAX-based components, but don't have anything > > other to offer than a strong yes vote for that. > > >

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-02 Thread Werner Punz
Neal Haggard wrote: We would love to see the AJAX-based components, but don't have anything other to offer than a strong yes vote for that. Yes ajax based components would be nice, btw. I did some checking to save work for my current project (which also is in need for ajax components and only

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-02 Thread Dave Sag
I think this is a top idea. I'm not sure who decides these things of how but if my vote counted i'd say go for it. cheers dave On 02/06/2005, at 5:41 PM, Martin Marinschek wrote: Hey guys & girls, have you read about that Google Summer-of-code initiative (http://code.google.com/summero

Re: Google Open Source

2005-06-02 Thread Martin Marinschek
Well, this is one of my most favourite items on the list as well ;) regards, Martin On 6/2/05, Neal Haggard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We would love to see the AJAX-based components, but don't have anything other > to offer than a strong yes vote for that. > > -Original Message- > Fr

RE: Google Open Source

2005-06-02 Thread Neal Haggard
We would love to see the AJAX-based components, but don't have anything other to offer than a strong yes vote for that. -Original Message- From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 11:41 AM To: MyFaces Development; MyFaces Discussion Subject: Google