RE: f:attribute problem

2006-09-15 Thread Iordanov, Borislav \(GIC\)
Ok, it's a bug then -Original Message- From: Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 1:20 PM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: f:attribute problem Iordanov, Borislav (GIC) skrev den 15-09-2006 18:33: > Well, thanks, but still, is

Re: f:attribute problem

2006-09-15 Thread Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Iordanov, Borislav (GIC) skrev den 15-09-2006 18:33: Well, thanks, but still, isn't that a bug in f:attribute? As I understand it, the f:attribute expression is evaluated at a different time where the sRequest variable is not in scope anymore. -- Thorbjørn smime.p7s Description: S/MIME

RE: f:attribute problem

2006-09-15 Thread Iordanov, Borislav \(GIC\)
15, 2006 12:54 PM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: RE: f:attribute problem Don't you want to use f:param to set parameters on commandLinks? Or are you actually trying to store the value in the attribute map of the command link component and when you try to get the attribute out of the attribute m

RE: f:attribute problem

2006-09-15 Thread Hagen, Nicholas
islav (GIC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 11:33 AM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: RE: f:attribute problem Well, thanks, but still, isn't that a bug in f:attribute? Don't want to use tomahawk tags at this time, especially when there shouldn't be a

RE: f:attribute problem

2006-09-15 Thread Iordanov, Borislav \(GIC\)
aces Discussion Subject: Re: f:attribute problem Iordanov, Borislav (GIC) skrev den 15-09-2006 18:25: > Hi, > > Given the code: > > > > > > > The value of #{sRequest.id} in the outputText tag is correctly evaluated > (it dis

Re: f:attribute problem

2006-09-15 Thread Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Iordanov, Borislav (GIC) skrev den 15-09-2006 18:25: Hi, Given the code: The value of #{sRequest.id} in the outputText tag is correctly evaluated (it displays), but not so for the f:attribute where the evaluation returns null. Any idea why? I need to attach th