Re: status of tiles support

2006-11-03 Thread Martin Kuhn
Hi, we use Tiles with MyFaces 1.1.4 and a Tomahawk 1.1.5 snapshot without problems. Here some notes of my point of view (as I already stated in the ajax4jsf mailing list because of Tiles problems) The reason why we selected Tiles was, that when we started with JSF, there was no templating fram

Re: Re: status of tiles support

2006-10-26 Thread Greg Reddin
On 10/26/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: dude. Tiles support was added, when tiles was still cool and was not the funniest (or still is) for doing that. now we have facelets, why tiles ? :) We should keep it for backward fun, but I am def. +1 on @deprecated I wouldn't comp

Re: status of tiles support

2006-10-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
IL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 01:46 PM >To: users@myfaces.apache.org >Subject: Re: status of tiles support > >I am using tiles with myfaces 1.1.4 and tomahawk 1.1.3; works like a charm... :) > >BTJ > >On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:44:30 + >"Dennis

Re: status of tiles support

2006-10-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
0.9 days :) >> >> Dennis Byrne >> >> >-Original Message- >> >From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 01:40 PM >> >To: 'MyFaces Discussion' >> >Subject: Re: status of tiles s

Re: status of tiles support

2006-10-26 Thread Dennis Byrne
7; 1.0.9 days :) >> >> Dennis Byrne >> >> >-Original Message- >> >From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 01:40 PM >> >To: 'MyFaces Discussion' >> >Subject: Re: status of t

Re: status of tiles support

2006-10-26 Thread Dennis Byrne
This is good to hear. I thought it had gone the way of the WML render kit. Dennis Byrne >-Original Message- >From: Bjørn T Johansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 01:46 PM >To: users@myfaces.apache.org >Subject: Re: status of tiles suppor

Re: status of tiles support

2006-10-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
AIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 01:40 PM > >To: 'MyFaces Discussion' > >Subject: Re: status of tiles support > > > >it is this clazz > > > >org.apache.myfaces.tomahawk.application.jsp.JspTilesViewHandlerImpl > > > >To b

Re: status of tiles support

2006-10-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
>-Original Message- >From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 01:40 PM >To: 'MyFaces Discussion' >Subject: Re: status of tiles support > >it is this clazz > >org.apache.myfaces.tomahawk.application.jsp.Js

Re: status of tiles support

2006-10-26 Thread Bjørn T Johansen
ficially be retired ? To my knowledge these > haven't worked well since the good ol' 1.0.9 days :) > > Dennis Byrne > > >-Original Message- > >From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 01:40 PM > >To:

Re: status of tiles support

2006-10-26 Thread Dennis Byrne
PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 01:40 PM >To: 'MyFaces Discussion' >Subject: Re: status of tiles support > >it is this clazz > >org.apache.myfaces.tomahawk.application.jsp.JspTilesViewHandlerImpl > >To be honest, you should try Facelets instead of Tiles

Re: status of tiles support

2006-10-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
it is this clazz org.apache.myfaces.tomahawk.application.jsp.JspTilesViewHandlerImpl To be honest, you should try Facelets instead of Tiles for templating a JSF app -Matthias On 10/26/06, Michael Südkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I wonder what is the status of the tiles support? The

Re: status of tiles support

2006-10-26 Thread Jeff Bischoff
> The myfaces-examples are still at version 1.1.1 Not entirely true... Look for source and examples to accompany Tomahawk in future releases. But for now, you can look at the examples in source (svn) or via the nightly builds [1]. If you download e.g. tomahawk-examples-1.1.5-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip