Hi,
I see that tiles support is not yet available in myfaces 1.2 (tomahawk
1.6/7).
I wonder if anyone has got a success story to share? Someone got any idea in
which release to expect it?
Deepesh
n
Michael Südkamp wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I wonder what is the status of the tiles support?
>
> The myfaces-examples are still at version 1.1.1 and the included tiles
> web-app will not run with the the 1.1.3 libs (and probably also not with
&
On 10/26/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
dude.
Tiles support was added, when tiles was still cool and
was not the funniest (or still is) for doing that.
now we have facelets, why tiles ? :)
We should keep it for backward fun, but I am def. +1 on @deprecated
I wo
IL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 01:46 PM
>To: users@myfaces.apache.org
>Subject: Re: status of tiles support
>
>I am using tiles with myfaces 1.1.4 and tomahawk 1.1.3; works like a charm...
:)
>
>BTJ
>
>On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:44:30 +
>"Dennis
Dennis Byrne
>On 10/26/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Matze,
>>
>> Am I the only one who feels the Tiles support and javascriptless feature
should officially be retired ? To my knowledge these haven't worked well since the
good ol' 1.
yrne
>On 10/26/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Matze,
>>
>> Am I the only one who feels the Tiles support and javascriptless feature
>> should officially be retired ? To my knowledge these haven't worked well
>> since the good ol
This is good to hear. I thought it had gone the way of the WML render kit.
Dennis Byrne
>-Original Message-
>From: Bjørn T Johansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 01:46 PM
>To: users@myfaces.apache.org
>Subject: Re: status of tiles suppor
AIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 01:40 PM
> >To: 'MyFaces Discussion'
> >Subject: Re: status of tiles support
> >
> >it is this clazz
> >
> >org.apache.myfaces.tomahawk.application.jsp.JspTilesViewHandlerImpl
> >
> >To b
dude.
Tiles support was added, when tiles was still cool and
was not the funniest (or still is) for doing that.
now we have facelets, why tiles ? :)
We should keep it for backward fun, but I am def. +1 on @deprecated
JS less :) sure +1 on that.
you are not the only one ;)
back to alaska
I am using tiles with myfaces 1.1.4 and tomahawk 1.1.3; works like a charm... :)
BTJ
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:44:30 +
"Dennis Byrne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Matze,
>
> Am I the only one who feels the Tiles support and javascriptless feature
> should of
Hi Matze,
Am I the only one who feels the Tiles support and javascriptless feature should
officially be retired ? To my knowledge these haven't worked well since the
good ol' 1.0.9 days :)
Dennis Byrne
>-Original Message-
>From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL
it is this clazz
org.apache.myfaces.tomahawk.application.jsp.JspTilesViewHandlerImpl
To be honest, you should try Facelets instead of Tiles for templating a JSF app
-Matthias
On 10/26/06, Michael Südkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I wonder what is the status of the tiles s
Michael Südkamp wrote:
> Yes, thank you I expected it still at the release builds.
>
Some of that stuff was missing from releases during the summer builds,
because the team was still switching over to use maven. They have
resumed with the full complement of release artifacts with the Core
1.1.
Yes, thank you I expected it still at the release builds.
Michael
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Jeff Bischoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Oktober 2006 18:07
> An: MyFaces Discussion
> Betreff: Re: status of tiles support
>
>
> &g
HOT-bin.zip, that has
a myfaces-example-tiles-1.1.5-SNAPSHOT.war.
Enjoy!
[1] http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/
Regards,
Jeff Bischoff
Kenneth L Kurz & Associates, Inc.
Michael Südkamp wrote:
Hello,
I wonder what is the status of the tiles support?
The myfaces-examples are s
Hello,
I wonder what is the status of the tiles support?
The myfaces-examples are still at version 1.1.1 and the included tiles
web-app will not run with the the 1.1.3 libs (and probably also not with
1.1.4) (java.lang.ClassNotFoundException
unfortunately it was renamed :-(
On 5/3/06, Wei Chiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alin Dosoniu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You have to change the view-handler to
>
org.apache.myfaces.tomahawk.application.jsp.JspTilesViewHandlerImpl.
>
>
> There is a tomahawk between myfaces and application in path of cla
Alin Dosoniu wrote:
Hi,
You have to change the view-handler to
org.apache.myfaces.tomahawk.application.jsp.JspTilesViewHandlerImpl.
There is a tomahawk between myfaces and application in path of class.
Thanks. It works now. It was careless of me not noticing the differences.
Wei
Alin
Hi,
You have to change the view-handler to
org.apache.myfaces.tomahawk.application.jsp.JspTilesViewHandlerImpl.
There is a tomahawk between myfaces and application in path of class.
Alin.
Greetings.
Does the latest myfaces (1.1.4 & tomawak 1.1.3) from the svn repository
still support tiles
Greetings.
Does the latest myfaces (1.1.4 & tomawak 1.1.3) from the svn repository
still support tiles?
I got the following messages during application start up. I was able
to see the named class from the Jar file, but the class loader was not.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions on h
PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 12:08
PMTo: MyFaces DiscussionSubject: Anyone have a example of
Tiles support with MyFaces?
Specificlly I am looking at using JspTilesViewHandler.
Thanks
Glenn
Start your
day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
Specificlly I am looking at using JspTilesViewHandler.
Thanks
Glenn
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
no longer totally impossible.
- Original Message -
From:
Rob
Decker
To: MyFaces Discussion
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 9:15
AM
Subject: Re: tiles support
That did occur as a non-optimum workaround
that wouldn't work because I wanted to render differ
could be a useful action instead of just a
required one.
- Original Message -
From:
Neal
Haggard
To: MyFaces Discussion
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 8:59
AM
Subject: RE: tiles support
Probably not the answer you want, but if you surround the
f:verba
esday, April 19, 2005 4:50 PMTo: MyFaces
DiscussionSubject: Re: tiles support
This has been a real issue for me as well. The
whole interaction with JSTL/JSP/HTML/_javascript_ (or lack thereof to be more
exact) is a major flaw in jsf. Even when I thought I saw a value in having
f:verbatim wrap my
dered attribute to it.
- Original Message -
From:
Claudio
Tamietto
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; MyFaces
Discussion
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 12:08
PM
Subject: Re: tiles support
Thanks for the answer !
I realized but i think it is a severe limitations
and i hope
Subject: RE: tiles support
Hi
Claudio
It appears there are
work arounds, but the basic idea is that you cannot put html inside an
included file (using tiles), you can only use jsf components.
The way around it is
to use around all the html tags in the
included file
Check out http://myfaces.apache.org. There is a section on Tiles
support in the "Components" tab. There are some limitations with
Tiles and JSF but things are going to get better with Tiles becoming a
TLP, increased support in Shale and improvements to the JSF and JSP
specs on the hori
Hi
You
have to surround all "pure" html with f:verbatim tags
Hermod
-Original Message-From: Claudio Tamietto
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 1:58 PMTo: myfaces-user@incubator.apache.orgSubject: tiles
support
is there an effective s
think this should be the
desired behaviour, but it is what happens currently.
Thanks
James
From: Claudio Tamietto
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 April 2005 12:58
To:
myfaces-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: tiles support
is there an effective support for tyles in
is there an effective support for tyles in
myfaces implementation ?.
I posted the question because i have the following
problem :
i have a first jsp page with a lot of html . At some point i include
another jsp.page
n't
> being called?
>
> I'm using 1.0.9.rc3.
>
> --
> Rob
>
> @objectsource.org
>
> -- Original Message ---
> From: "rhightower" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'MyFaces Discussion'"
> Sent: Wed, 13 Apr 2
e ---
From: "rhightower" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'MyFaces Discussion'"
Sent: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:10:56 -0700
Subject: RE: Problems with MyFaces Tiles support
> Rob,
>
> Actually it is a good consolation. I was worried that I was barking up the
> w
You may take a second look at it. The following site runs on tomcat
5.0.28, myfaces 1.0.9 with its tiles viewHandler http://www.dbgroups.com
BaTien
DBGROUPS
rhightower wrote:
When I use MyFaces tiles support, the buttons don’t work. This is
taken from a small app where tiles was working with
g mistakes in the code listings that I sent?
Are you using 1.0.9 RC3 or the last release?
-Original Message-
From: Rob Decker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 12:51 PM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: Problems with MyFaces Tiles support
If it's any consol
If it's any consolation I'm using myfaces on tomcat 5.0.30 with tiles support
and my
forms/commandButtons/commandLinks work.
--
Rob
@objectsource.org
-- Original Message ---
From: "rhightower" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:20:
36 matches
Mail list logo
