glad to hear!
On Nov 29, 2007 8:56 AM, Ron Smits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are more and more switching to jsf and tomahawk here, The stuff rocks :)
On Nov 29, 2007 8:40 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 7:57 AM, Ron Smits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We use
Hi,
Unless you're writing an app that really is partitioned into separate web and
business tiers on separate machines, then I would recommend using just a
servlet engine (tomcat or jetty) plus Spring.
EJB application servers really add to development hassles, due to the need to
build jars to
I agree with Simon,
Using spring to manage JSF beans is just great, blogged about it lately to
show how to implement it.
http://cagataycivici.wordpress.com/2007/09/10/using-spring-to-manage-jsf-beans/
Cagatay
On Nov 29, 2007 10:42 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully
Hi!
Hopefully JSF2.0 will have a better managed bean (IOC) system defined. Or
that they will drop that part of the spec completely, and just recommend
that an external one be used.
due to the lack of openness, we'll get a surprise :-)
If Sun would recommend to use Spring ... now
due to the lack of openness, we'll get a surprise :-)
If Sun would recommend to use Spring ... now THAT would be a surprise
there is already a JSR, that covers DI
... :-)
Ciao,
Mario
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
the benefit in using Orchestra is, that it requires to have managed
beans in spring.
it forces you to do the right thing :-)
A simple demo app, is hosted at [1]
-M
[1] code.google.com/p/facesgoodies
On Nov 29, 2007 9:45 AM, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Simon,
Using
And with Spring2.5, EJB-style classpath scanning and EJB annotations are
supported too, if you prefer annotation over configuration. Annotation is
certainly quicker, but possibly harder to avoid name conflicts etc in larger
projects...
// automatically declare a managed bean named
Hopefully JSF2.0 will have a better managed bean (IOC) system defined. Or
that they will drop that part of the spec completely, and just recommend that
an external one be used.
due to the lack of openness, we'll get a surprise :-)
Regards,
Simon
Oscar Duque [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 29, 2007 11:00 AM, Michael Heinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using tomahawk for nearly two years now and don't plan to migrate
to Trinidad with existing projects.
I am afraid that Tomahawk could be a showstopper for a migration from
myFaces 1.1.5 to 1.2.1.
we should add this point
Hi!
I am afraid that Tomahawk could be a showstopper for a migration from
myFaces 1.1.5 to 1.2.1.
I use tomahawk here with MyFaces 1.2.x-head (with facelets). No real
problems here so far.
Ciao,
Mario
I am using tomahawk for nearly two years now and don't plan to migrate
to Trinidad with existing projects.
I am afraid that Tomahawk could be a showstopper for a migration from
myFaces 1.1.5 to 1.2.1.
A rough myFaces roadmap would be highly appreciated for development
plans.
Michael
Hi!
-- Then I'm sure you're not working with the combo MF1.2 + Facelets +
Tomahawk 2.0 because that's a joke. Even selectOneMenu's don't work
properly. (have a look at the posted bugs)
Dont know what Tomahawk 2.0 is, but this is the list of libraries we use
(-dev means they are home-made
On Nov 29, 2007 11:16 AM, Philippe Lamote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We use Tomahawk a lot in several projects. I would not like to see
tomahawk getting swallowed up in trinidad. Each has its place. I would
prefer to seem the stay the way they are.
weren't you saying they should be unified ?
We use Tomahawk a lot in several projects. I would not like to see
tomahawk getting swallowed up in trinidad. Each has its place. I would
prefer to seem the stay the way they are.
-- Then I'm sure you're not working with the combo MF1.2 + Facelets +
Tomahawk 2.0 because that's a joke. Even
Take an example: most people would agree facelets is good idea. The
Jsf 1.2 spec is out since May 11, 2006. We're 1,5 yr(one and a half
year!) further down the line but there is no working combination for
MF1.2 + Facelets + Tomahawk 2.0 (the latter, I've been told, is in
line with the MF 1.2
On 29 Nov 2007, at 11:18, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 11:16 AM, Philippe Lamote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We use Tomahawk a lot in several projects. I would not like to see
tomahawk getting swallowed up in trinidad. Each has its place. I
would
prefer to seem the stay the way
Hello Bernd,
when will ne next Tobago version 1.0.13 be released?
My next try is to upgrade our app from Tobago 1.0.10 to 1.0.12.
Regards
Carsten
Sitz der Gesellschaft / Corporate Headquarters:
Lufthansa Systems AS GmbH, Norderstedt
Registereintragung / Registration:
Amtsgericht
Mixing tomahawk and trinidad is a very bad idea in my eyes!
All projects that use a4j or other ajax enabled component frameworks are
not compatible to Trinidad (or each other).
Michael
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matthias Wessendorf
not really mixing;
For the trinidad-sandbox, I'll put in a renderer from Tomahawk,
to show this as a show-case...
But, not really mixing both.
As I said,I am not a fan of a containsEveryThing:comp / lib.
The whole incompatibility is true for several libs; due to not having a
clean
Hi Bart,
On Nov 29, 2007 2:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
We're using Eclipse here and we're planning to implement our next
application as a JSF web application, using Trinidad as implementation and
as provider of extended components. We would like some sort of near-WYSIWYG
Hi list,
We're using Eclipse here and we're planning to implement our next
application as a JSF web application, using Trinidad as implementation and
as provider of extended components. We would like some sort of
near-WYSIWYG design time support in Eclipse. In the Eclipse WTP project,
there
I am not really familiar with the WPE (web page editor), but I know
that the JSF-tooling is
working on Facelets support (see [1]) and there may be other things as
well.
no! just said, that the Eclipse-JSF-tooling is active and they are
adding features
(based on demand). One requested
Hi,
i can't find the skinning selector for the component panelHorizontalLayout.
I use Trinidad 1.0.4. Is there no selector or did i miss something?
Bes regards
Daniel
--
View this message in context:
Hi Matthias (and list),
Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29-11-2007 15:03:03:
Hi Bart,
On Nov 29, 2007 2:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
We're using Eclipse here and we're planning to implement our next
application as a JSF web application, using Trinidad
Hello Carsten,
in one or two weeks.
Regards
Bernd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hello Bernd,
when will ne next Tobago version 1.0.13 be released?
My next try is to upgrade our app from Tobago 1.0.10 to 1.0.12.
Regards
Carsten
Sitz der Gesellschaft / Corporate Headquarters:
Hello Bernd,
I've updated our app to Tobago version 1.0.12 and the Page cannot be
loaded error in IE6 still occurs. Can you tell me, when version 1.0.13
with the JavaScript fix will be released? As an attachement you'll find
our main JSF-Application-File.
Regards,
Carsten
Sitz der
Hello Carsten,
i don't think the javascript cause the error. But you can try the fix
with the nightly build.
http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/
Regards
Bernd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hello Bernd,
I've updated our app to Tobago version 1.0.12 and the Page cannot be
loaded
Hi all,
I'm using a combination of Spring and MyFaces for my project. Since I use
the managed bean properties to inject my Spring beans into my managed beans,
I'm unable to do initialization in the constructor, and I really need to
implement a callback in my managed beans to initialize values
Hi all,
I am trying to convert my adf webapp to Trinidad webapp. Everything
seems to work fine except for tr:navigationTree. The tree does not
expand/collapse. Has anyone used tr:navigationTree successfully?
Thanks
Bill
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The information contained in this
Hello Everybody,
I am trying to use t:collapsiblePanel in a t:dataTable as one of the
column.
Number of rows in the dataTable are not predefined and can contain a
dynamic list (Which changes based on search criteria).
When I try to associate the collapsiblePanel, I am getting an exception
of
Hi,
the properties of managed beans are set in the order they occur in the
faces-config.xml. This is in the spec, so you can use the last
property setter as
initMethod.
Regards,
Volker
2007/11/29, Todd Nine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I'm using a combination of Spring and MyFaces for
hello bill,
have you already looked at the sample source code of:
http://www.irian.at/trinidad-demo/faces/components/navigationTree.jspx
regards,
gerhard
2007/11/29, Leng, William [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I am trying to convert my adf webapp to Trinidad webapp. Everything seems
to
Hello Everybody,
I am trying to use t:collapsiblePanel in a t:dataTable as one of the
column.
Number of rows in the dataTable are not predefined and can contain a
dynamic list (Which changes based on search criteria).
When I try to associate the collapsiblePanel, I am getting an exception
of
Gerhard,
I did. Actually, I deployed the demo war in the same Glassfish as my
webapp. The demo works but mine does not. I took a close look at the
demo code I could not find why mine does not work.
Bill
From: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Todd,
Yes, I agree with Gerald.
Have a look at catagay's more recent post:
http://cagataycivici.wordpress.com/2007/09/10/using-spring-to-manage-jsf-beans/
Since Spring 2.0 it has been possible to declare a scope in spring bean
configuration, so there is absolutely no point in using JSF
Hi,
this is my problem:
I have integrated MyFaces Tomahawk 1.6.2 + Facelets 1.1.13
this is my form:
h:form id=userForm
table
tr
td
h:outputText id=label1 value=#{msg.userForm_password}:/
t:inputText id=username
value=#{user.username}
Hello Bernd,
our problems are resolved. After searching for about two weeks the
firewall team has discovered the rules responsible for our Page cannot
be loaded error.
But good to know that the next Tobago version hasn't the JavaScript code
in the post buffer.
Regards
Carsten Manshusen
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 14:59 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I am trying to use t:collapsiblePanel in a t:dataTable as one of the
column.
Number of rows in the dataTable are not predefined and can contain a
dynamic list (Which changes based on search criteria).
Hello Everybody,
I am trying to use t:collapsiblePanel in a t:dataTable as one of the
column.
Number of rows in the dataTable are not predefined and can contain a
dynamic list (Which changes based on search criteria).
When I try to associate the collapsiblePanel, I am getting an exception
of
hello bill,
which versions did you use?
sounds like you configured trinidad right (you mentioned all other
trinidad features seem to work fine)
however, is it possible for you to provide more details?
e.g.:
did you already tried other tree components of trinidad?
- did these components work?
is
Hi Simon,
Inside t:column I would be declaring t:collapsiblePanel. If I don't
declare an ID for t:collapsiblePanel then I am getting the exception.
I cant declare a hardcoded ID as the number of rows are are not
predefined.
All the samples given are having ID's hardcoded in the jsp page.
Gerhard,
I compared both demo and my app and found a difference. The demo output
has the line
onclick=_adftree_idJsp7.treeState.action('show','2',this);return false;
While my app has the line
onclick=_adftreetestTreeId.select(this,'0');
I filed a bug report at
Hi Gerhard,
Did some more test and found something very interesting.
I copied my .jspx and .class files to the trinidad-demo-1.2.3 directory
(in the right package structure) and modified faces-config.xml to add my
bean. Restart glassfish and it works now.
I compared
Its not abount web servers anymore, but do you know how to inject request
parameters like
managed-property
property-nameid/property-name
value#{param.id}/value
/managed-property
with those annotations?
René
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Simon Kitching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hello bill,
before you sent your last mail i also made some quick tests with a different
environment
your implementation with:
- trinidad 1.0.x
- tomcat
- jsp and also with facelets
works just fine.
(it doesn't really help you - however, it shows that there is no basic
problem with the
Gerhard,
Thanks for spending time on this. I figured out why it did not work.
The myfaces-*.jar files are in ear/lib directory when it does not work.
After I put them in WEB-INF/lib directory, my app started to work. My
guess is that my web app might have actually used Sun's jsf
not sure if I could follow the complete thread correctly, so far.
however, a java_ee5 container should ignore the JSF-runtime libs, that
are shipped w/ the deployed app.
Glassfish uses (for some reasons) the RI.
Trinidad 1.2 works with both:
-RI 1.2
-myfaces 1.2
HTH,
Matthias
On Nov 29, 2007
hello bill,
you are welcome!
matthias already mentioned information about the combination you mentioned.
please don't forget to change or remove your issue TRINIDAD-820 (thanks)
regards,
gerhard
2007/11/29, Leng, William [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gerhard,
Thanks for spending time on this. I
Thanks guys. I'll probably just go with the managed property method and add
my inits to the last setter. I wasn't aware that it is part of the spec
that they're loaded in defined order. Knowing that makes it much easier to
fix the issue. As far as using Spring beans for business objects, I use
No,
just looked at the renderer, no selectors for that guy.
-M
On Nov 29, 2007 3:22 PM, Daniel Niklas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i can't find the skinning selector for the component panelHorizontalLayout.
I use Trinidad 1.0.4. Is there no selector or did i miss something?
Bes regards
Hi,
Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote:
for what it is worth :-)
If you want to adjust some skinning for panelFormLayout ;-)
E.g: I want to declare a general padding or margin for this component.
In my opinion all components, which are relevant for rendering, should be
skinnable.
(...but for
Hi Matthias,
what a shame. Shoud i post an jira issue (enhancement)?
Daniel
Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote:
No,
just looked at the renderer, no selectors for that guy.
-M
On Nov 29, 2007 3:22 PM, Daniel Niklas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
i can't find the skinning selector for the
for what it is worth :-)
On Nov 30, 2007 8:16 AM, Daniel Niklas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matthias,
what a shame. Shoud i post an jira issue (enhancement)?
Daniel
Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote:
No,
just looked at the renderer, no selectors for that guy.
-M
On Nov 29, 2007
yes.. ;)
create it, and provide a patch :)
On Nov 30, 2007 8:48 AM, Daniel Niklas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Matthias Wessendorf-4 wrote:
for what it is worth :-)
If you want to adjust some skinning for panelFormLayout ;-)
E.g: I want to declare a general padding or margin for
54 matches
Mail list logo
