glad to hear!
On Nov 29, 2007 8:56 AM, Ron Smits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are more and more switching to jsf and tomahawk here, The stuff rocks :)
On Nov 29, 2007 8:40 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 7:57 AM, Ron Smits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We use
.
Michael
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matthias Wessendorf
Sent: Donnerstag, 29. November 2007 09:02
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: Future Focus Question: Tomahawk or Trinidad
glad to hear!
On Nov 29, 2007 8:56 AM, Ron Smits
Hi!
I am afraid that Tomahawk could be a showstopper for a migration from
myFaces 1.1.5 to 1.2.1.
I use tomahawk here with MyFaces 1.2.x-head (with facelets). No real
problems here so far.
Ciao,
Mario
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matthias Wessendorf
Sent: Donnerstag, 29. November 2007 09:02
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: Future Focus Question: Tomahawk or Trinidad
glad to hear!
On Nov 29, 2007 8:56 AM, Ron Smits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We
Hi!
-- Then I'm sure you're not working with the combo MF1.2 + Facelets +
Tomahawk 2.0 because that's a joke. Even selectOneMenu's don't work
properly. (have a look at the posted bugs)
Dont know what Tomahawk 2.0 is, but this is the list of libraries we use
(-dev means they are home-made
On Nov 29, 2007 11:16 AM, Philippe Lamote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We use Tomahawk a lot in several projects. I would not like to see
tomahawk getting swallowed up in trinidad. Each has its place. I would
prefer to seem the stay the way they are.
weren't you saying they should be unified ?
We use Tomahawk a lot in several projects. I would not like to see
tomahawk getting swallowed up in trinidad. Each has its place. I would
prefer to seem the stay the way they are.
-- Then I'm sure you're not working with the combo MF1.2 + Facelets +
Tomahawk 2.0 because that's a joke. Even
Take an example: most people would agree facelets is good idea. The
Jsf 1.2 spec is out since May 11, 2006. We're 1,5 yr(one and a half
year!) further down the line but there is no working combination for
MF1.2 + Facelets + Tomahawk 2.0 (the latter, I've been told, is in
line with the MF 1.2
On 29 Nov 2007, at 11:18, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 11:16 AM, Philippe Lamote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We use Tomahawk a lot in several projects. I would not like to see
tomahawk getting swallowed up in trinidad. Each has its place. I
would
prefer to seem the stay the way
Sent: Donnerstag, 29. November 2007 12:24
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: Future Focus Question: Tomahawk or Trinidad
Take an example: most people would agree facelets is good idea. The
Jsf 1.2 spec is out since May 11, 2006. We're 1,5 yr(one and a half
year!) further down the line
).
Michael
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matthias Wessendorf
Sent: Donnerstag, 29. November 2007 12:24
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: Future Focus Question: Tomahawk or Trinidad
Take an example: most people would agree
Hi List,
Over the last half year, it seems Tomahawk, despite some fine
components, is dead; the 2.0 release hasn't gotten off the ground for
al these months, and no one seems to be actively developing it.
Trinidad on the other hand seems to acquire more and more momentum.
Now, as Tomahawk
Hi,
On Nov 28, 2007 10:20 PM, Philippe Lamote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List,
Over the last half year, it seems Tomahawk, despite some fine
components, is dead; the 2.0 release hasn't gotten off the ground for
al these months, and no one seems to be actively developing it.
Trinidad on
We use Tomahawk a lot in several projects. I would not like to see
tomahawk getting swallowed up in trinidad. Each has its place. I would
prefer to seem the stay the way they are.
It might be good though to maybe find more developers to keep the
versions working and in sync with eachother. Shout
On Nov 29, 2007 7:57 AM, Ron Smits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We use Tomahawk a lot in several projects. I would not like to see
tomahawk getting swallowed up in trinidad. Each has its place. I would
prefer to seem the stay the way they are.
Putting them on-top of Trinidad is only one option.
We are more and more switching to jsf and tomahawk here, The stuff rocks :)
On Nov 29, 2007 8:40 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 7:57 AM, Ron Smits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We use Tomahawk a lot in several projects. I would not like to see
tomahawk getting
16 matches
Mail list logo
