ttribute –
> I have a test VM ready to go.
>
>
>
> Thanks everyone for your input.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
> *From:* Andrew Grande [mailto:apere...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 27, 2017 5:08 PM
>
>
> *To:* users@ni
for your input.
Regards,
Kevin
From: Andrew Grande [mailto:apere...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 5:08 PM
To: users@nifi.apache.org
Subject: Re: Back Pressure Object threshold not honored
I would also suggest the ControlRate processor in front of a sensitive step.
There's a c
>>
>>
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Andy LoPresto [mailto:alopre...@apache.org]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, April 27, 2017 4:16 PM
>> *To:* users@nifi.apache.org
>> *Subject:* Re: Back Pressure Object thres
.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 27, 2017 4:16 PM
> *To:* users@nifi.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Back Pressure Object threshold not honored
>
>
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
>
>
> Sorry to hear you are having this issue. Can you please provide a
> screenshot of the connection prop
@nifi.apache.org
Subject: Re: Back Pressure Object threshold not honored
Hi Kevin,
Sorry to hear you are having this issue. Can you please provide a screenshot of
the connection properties in the configuration dialog? How quickly do those
flowfiles get enqueued? I think there’s a chance if they
Hi Kevin,
Sorry to hear you are having this issue. Can you please provide a screenshot of
the connection properties in the configuration dialog? How quickly do those
flowfiles get enqueued? I think there’s a chance if they are very small & the
previous processor is very fast (i.e. RouteOnAttrib
I have an odd problem. I set the Back Pressure Object threshold on a link
between two Processors to 1, but 200 flowfiles are passed to the queue before
back pressure is honored. I need the back pressure to be set to a small number
of flowfiles to keep the source from flooding the destination. Ha
