t; Original Message
>Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: Polling Processors impact on Latency
>Local Time: November 7, 2017 7:29 AM
>UTC Time: November 7, 2017 12:29 PM
>From: pwi...@micron.com
>To: users@nifi.apache.org <users@nifi.apache.org>
>
>
>If you sched
ubject: RE: [EXT] Re: Polling Processors impact on Latency
>Local Time: November 7, 2017 7:29 AM
>UTC Time: November 7, 2017 12:29 PM
>From: pwi...@micron.com
>To: users@nifi.apache.org <users@nifi.apache.org>
>
>
>If you schedule the processor to run every 0 sec (the
uration=10 millis
Thanks,
Peter
From: Chirag Dewan [mailto:chirag.dewa...@yahoo.in]
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2017 8:02 PM
To: apere...@gmail.com; users@nifi.apache.org
Subject: [EXT] Re: Polling Processors impact on Latency
Thanks Andrew for the quick response.
I am more concerned about the
Thanks Andrew for the quick response.
I am more concerned about the processors polling for flow files on the
connection between the processors?
Thanks,
Chirag
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 at 5:24 PM, Andrew Grande wrote:
Yes, polling increases
Yes, polling increases latency in some cases. But no, NiFi is not just
polling. It has all kinds of sources, and listening vs polling vs
subscribing purely depends on the protocol of that given processor.
Hope this helps,
Andrew
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017, 1:39 AM Chirag Dewan
Hi All,
I am a layman to NiFi. I am exploring NiFi as a data flow engine to be
integrated with my Flink processing engine. A brief history of our approach :
We are trying to build a Streaming Data processing engine. We started off with
Flink as the sole core engine, which is responsible for