Re: Processors on the fly for many sensor devices

2016-12-27 Thread ddewaele
-on-the-fly-for-many-sensor-devices-tp47p540.html Sent from the Apache NiFi Users List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Processors on the fly for many sensor devices

2016-12-16 Thread Andrew Psaltis
t to close them). > > I've logged most of the issues I encountered on Andrew's github repo. > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-nifi-users-list. > 2361937.n4.nabble.com/Re-Processors-on-the-fly-for- > many-sensor-devices-tp47p466.html > Sent f

Re: Processors on the fly for many sensor devices

2016-12-16 Thread ddewaele
restart to close them). I've logged most of the issues I encountered on Andrew's github repo. -- View this message in context: http://apache-nifi-users-list.2361937.n4.nabble.com/Re-Processors-on-the-fly-for-many-sensor-devices-tp47p466.html Sent from the Apache NiFi Users List mailing list archive

Re: Processors on the fly for many sensor devices

2016-12-14 Thread ddewaele
. -- View this message in context: http://apache-nifi-users-list.2361937.n4.nabble.com/Re-Processors-on-the-fly-for-many-sensor-devices-tp47p427.html Sent from the Apache NiFi Users List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Processors on the fly for many sensor devices

2016-11-01 Thread Andrew Psaltis
Good morning Davy, I have all (barring tests that fail) code in place to fulfill NIFI-2615 [1]. I plan on wrapping up the testing of it today and submitting a P/R. One thing to call out is that at present it is it's own module. However, I plan on adding it to the NiFi Standard Processor bundle

Re: Processors on the fly for many sensor devices

2016-10-31 Thread Andrew Psaltis
Hi Davy, Thanks for the P/R - I merged that in just a little bit ago. I think the feature you are describing makes total sense, I'm sure this would be useful in many different use cases. I am in the process of wrapping up the changes to fulfill JIRA NIFI-2615 [1]. Do you want to add the

Re: Processors on the fly for many sensor devices

2016-10-03 Thread Davy De Waele
Hi Andrew, We'd be happy to test and provide feedback. We have a use-case now with Nifi that we're in the process of implementing. If you have sources or binaries feel free to let me know. Regards, Davy On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Andrew Psaltis wrote: > Hi

Re: Processors on the fly for many sensor devices

2016-09-30 Thread Davy De Waele
Hi Andrew, We tested your 0.0.6 binary and it seemed to do what we want. Unfortunately it is not compatible with the current Nifi version. Do you have a binary available that would work with nifi 1.0.0 ? Thx. On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Andrew Psaltis wrote: >

Re: Processors on the fly for many sensor devices

2016-09-28 Thread Andrew Psaltis
Davy, The processor I have been working on may meet your needs. You are correct, at this time I have not pushed the source for it, still working through some hurdles. The one thing to work out is how you would dynamically add the processors -- suppose you may be able to use the REST API for NiFi.

Re: Processors on the fly for many sensor devices

2016-09-28 Thread Bryan Bende
Just wanted to clarify something about ListenTCP... it does support multiple incoming connections, however if you using the batch output capability, one flow file will contain data across all the connections. I do agree with Andrew that based on the description it sounds like NiFi is expected to

Re: Processors on the fly for many sensor devices

2016-09-28 Thread Davy De Waele
Correct... But I don't think that one is in the official nifi distribution. I did stumble upon your repo / jira issue. (The repo didn't contain any sources, only binaries I think). But I guess there we would also need some way of dynamically adding these processors (as it would require 1

Re: Processors on the fly for many sensor devices

2016-09-28 Thread Davy De Waele
Hi, Thanks for the response ... it's an existing network of sensors. The sensors spit out data over a serial interface that is exposed over a tcp connection. (rs232 -> ethernet converter in the sensor). The current sensor architecture involves clients making direct connections to the individual

Re: Processors on the fly for many sensor devices

2016-09-28 Thread Joe Witt
Hello Can you talk a bit about why you'd want ListenTCP processors tied to a given sensor? You should be able to have many sensors to a single ListenTCP. Each stream will be between a source/sensor and nifi so data won't be getting intermingled there. If we're not providing enough

Processors on the fly for many sensor devices

2016-09-28 Thread Davy De Waele
We have a large number of sensors that send out data via TCP. The idea is to use a ListenTCP processor in Nifi to capture the data, do some filtering / basic transformation before sending it upstream into our stack. We can configure individual ListenTCP processors for each sensor, and that works