Thanks Mark, that was very helpful.
I have chained the commands now and writing the final output to stdout.
Thanks again,
Vijay
> On Feb 13, 2019, at 2:34 PM, Mark Payne wrote:
>
> Vijay,
>
> No worries, this thread is fine. The processor will stream the contents of
> the FlowFIle to the
Vijay,
No worries, this thread is fine. The processor will stream the contents of the
FlowFIle to the Standard Input (StdIn) of the process
that is generated. So it will go to the bash script. The bash script can do
whatever it needs to do, pipe to another command, etc.
Whatever is written to St
Mark,
Thanks for your quick response,
When calling bash script that has multiple commands, is there a single flow
file generated after all commands are executed (accumulating output from each
command) or multiple flow files generated per command line in the bash script.
Sorry for tagging alon
Vijay,
This would be treated as arguments to a single command.
One option would be to create a simple bash script that executes the desired
commands and invoke
that from the processor. Or, of course, you can chain together multiple
processors.
Thanks
-Mark
> On Feb 13, 2019, at 1:48 PM, Vija
Hi,
I have a ExecuteStreamCommand processor running a single command, (executing a
-jar ) and it runs fine,
I need to run the same command but with different arguments.
My question is: Can I put multiple lines as command arguments and still have a
single instance of the ExecuteStreamComm
