Re: OPEN EJB most recent version and POJO's.

2011-06-08 Thread David Blevins
first verify the bug also exists with the original version shipped by OpenEJB before filing anything. -David Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 19:15:05 -0700 From: ml-node+3581464-1241930645-42...@n4.nabble.com To: stargate7thsym...@live.co.uk Subject: Re: OPEN EJB most recent version and POJO's

Re: OPEN EJB most recent version and POJO's.

2011-06-07 Thread David Blevins
On Jun 6, 2011, at 4:15 PM, Zachary1234 wrote: However, if I wish to access the pojo outside of openEJB, or even on another network pc, the way to go is JNDI. Is there an easy way to bind a class or interface pojo to JNDI? Will just @JNDI (with an optional name) at the top do the trick?

Re: OPEN EJB most recent version and POJO's.

2011-06-07 Thread Zachary1234
Not quite, I'm simply looking for an example for how to declare -A Pojo which I can have instantiated within openEJB by the context.lookup call either -from within another static class/object within the same openEJB instance -on the same PC in a seperate JVM. -Or on a seperate PC in a seperate

Re: OPEN EJB most recent version and POJO's.

2011-06-07 Thread David Blevins
As of EJB 3.0 everything is based on POJOs exactly as you describe. POJOs with Remote and local access is supported through JNDI lookup. Different lifecycles are available. And all of it is standard and handled by the container exactly as you describe. In addition they can offer security

RE: OPEN EJB most recent version and POJO's.

2011-06-07 Thread Zachary1234
as expected? Is there any extra conf/xml configuration required here? Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 12:07:07 -0700 From: ml-node+3580513-1291411689-42...@n4.nabble.com To: stargate7thsym...@live.co.uk Subject: Re: OPEN EJB most recent version and POJO's. As of EJB 3.0 everything is based on POJOs

Re: OPEN EJB most recent version and POJO's.

2011-06-07 Thread David Blevins
your first EJB up and running. These examples are very nice too: http://openejb.apache.org/examples.html -David Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 12:07:07 -0700 From: ml-node+3580513-1291411689-42...@n4.nabble.com To: stargate7thsym...@live.co.uk Subject: Re: OPEN EJB most recent version and POJO's

Re: OPEN EJB most recent version and POJO's.

2011-06-06 Thread Andre Brito
Yes, it's possible. I'm using something like this: Swing - @Stateless Session Beans - POJOs, @Entities and Database operations. You don't have to annotate it. -- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/OPEN-EJB-most-recent-version-and-POJO-s-tp3576153p3576817.html Sent

RE: OPEN EJB most recent version and POJO's.

2011-06-06 Thread Zachary1234
+3576817-2077569707-42...@n4.nabble.com To: stargate7thsym...@live.co.uk Subject: Re: OPEN EJB most recent version and POJO's. Yes, it's possible. I'm using something like this: Swing - @Stateless Session Beans - POJOs, @Entities and Database operations. You don't have to annotate

OPEN EJB most recent version and POJO's.

2011-06-05 Thread Zachary1234
I it possible to simply deploy a plain old java object to openEJB as a compiled class in a jar file, and not as a fully blown EJB bean? Does this object need to have a class annotation? What is this annotation, what is it's import statement, what is the lib jar file for it (is it in SE/EE Java)?