ent.xml should be treated as
"annotated" jars and should be ignored with the default settings.
-David
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/openejb-tries-to-start-org.apache.tools.ant.Main-tp24623745p25118025.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ot;annotated" jars and should be ignored with the default settings.
>
> -David
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/openejb-tries-to-start-org.apache.tools.ant.Main-tp24623745p25118025.html
Sent from the OpenEJB User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ngtemplate:jar:3.0:provided
[INFO]\- antlr:antlr:jar:2.7.7:provided
-> We coud exclude the ant transitive dependency from commons-
jxpath in our
pom.xml ("") as a workaround, but I think this should be
rather
get fixed in openejb? why does it try to start the ant Main class?
O] \- antlr:stringtemplate:jar:3.0:provided
[INFO]\- antlr:antlr:jar:2.7.7:provided
-> We coud exclude the ant transitive dependency from commons-
jxpath in our
pom.xml ("") as a workaround, but I think this should be
rather
get fixed in openejb? why does it tr
:2.7.7:provided
-> We coud exclude the ant transitive dependency from commons-jxpath
in our
pom.xml ("") as a workaround, but I think this should be
rather
get fixed in openejb? why does it try to start the ant Main class?
regards,
andreas
--
View this message in co
the ant transitive dependency from commons-jxpath in our
pom.xml ("") as a workaround, but I think this should be rather
get fixed in openejb? why does it try to start the ant Main class?
regards,
andreas
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/openejb-t
