Does anybody recognize this exception? It seems to occur mostly on
transactions with updates and deletes. It hasn't occured on any persist
operations.
If I turn off the DataCache the problem goes away.
16-Jul-2008 12:09:07 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve invoke
SEVERE: Ser
Hi,
I have same problem. I have 2 tables on Sybase Anywhere:
@Entity
public class Employee {
@Id @GeneratedValue
private Long Id;
private String name;
...
}
@Entity
@IdClass(EmpHourId.class)
public class EmpHour {
@Id
private Long empId;
@Id
private L
OpenEJB provides their own JavaAgent to get the Instrumentation instances, but
they take a different approach to transforming the classes. In OpenJPA, as I
understand it, the enhancement is done aggressively and up front when the agent
loads - at least it acts like that since the agent MUST find
Gareth,
If you are still falling into the non-enhanced class file path, then there's
still something wrong with the javaagent processing. I'm not following the
reference that Nathan provided [1]. I'm not clear on what it's trying to
tell me. Is the javaagent provided by OpenEJB supposed to autom
Kevin,
Thanks for your suggestion, I have tried changing it to use the OpenJPA
jar file as you suggested, and added the relevant geronimo-jta jar file
to the class path, but unfortunately it still has the same problem with
unenhanced classes.
Thanks
Gareth
-Original Message-
From: Kevin
BTW - The OpenEJB agent is supposedly only there for OpenJPA's enhancement [1].
The code maybe slightly different, but it's necessary to use JPA+EJB with
OpenEJB as the provider.
[1] http://openejb.apache.org/tomcat.html#Tomcat-Limitations
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Sutter [mailto:[
Gareth,
I'm not familar with the openejb-javaagent-3.0.jar. Does that contain the
OpenJPA code? From what I can tell, it does not. (I just now noticed that
you had said you were using this and it didn't register when I first read
your note.)
Try replacing this stanza with the openjpa-1.1.0.jar
Kevin,
Thanks for your reply, I changed the RuntimeUnhenhancedClasses to
unsupported as you suggested and I did get the error message stating
that my a number of my classes were not enhanced. So does this mean
that the javaagent is not working correctly? I am specifying it in my
maven pom.xml wh
Gareth,
Recently, I found an obscure problem with the IBM JDK when using the
javaagent enhancement, but I don't see how this would apply to this
situation. You end up with a nasty exception from the Java runtime, and I
would think you would have mentioned that...
Other than than, I am not aware o
even though we do not commit after deleting the row from data table it is
not deleting wihtout commit..which is the same in case of 'remove'
then what is the difference between 'delete' and 'remove'
which is more efficient?
plz make me clear...
thanks
Patrick Linskey-2 wrote:
>
> persist() in
Hi
Openjpa 1.1.0
I am having a problem with runtime enhancement on my persistent
entities. Runtime enhancement completes during my test phase using the
openejb 3.0 javaagent, but when the unit tests run I have problems
relating to merges using the entityManager. The id field does not seem
to be
Ok, will get it from there. Thanks for your efforts. I will report
back then.
--
Marc Logemann
blog http://logemannreloaded.blogspot.com
privat http://www.logemann.org
Am 16.07.2008 um 01:02 schrieb Pinaki Poddar:
The fix is on the trunk i.e. 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT.
--
View this message in conte
12 matches
Mail list logo
