Great ! as usual, OpenJPA rocks :-)
On Sep 23, 2009, at 11:22 , Loïc Bresson -- Novlog wrote:
J Grassel wrote:
Hi, the problem you described sounds much like one I fixed in
OPENJPA-1061. I see you are using openjpa-1.2.1-r752877:753278 --
can you move up to
OpenJPA 1.2.x r791644 or later a
J Grassel wrote:
Hi, the problem you described sounds much like one I fixed in OPENJPA-1061.
I see you are using openjpa-1.2.1-r752877:753278 -- can you move up to
OpenJPA 1.2.x r791644 or later and give it a shot?
Hi.
We tried OpenJPA 1.2.2 snapshot and it seems to work fine.
Thanks.
--
Loïc
Hi, the problem you described sounds much like one I fixed in OPENJPA-1061.
I see you are using openjpa-1.2.1-r752877:753278 -- can you move up to
OpenJPA 1.2.x r791644 or later and give it a shot?
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/How-to-define-id-in-super-class
t;
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/How-to-define-id-in-super-class-tp3693696p3693807.html
Sent from the OpenJPA Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I thought it should be trivial but its not working and I found several
other people that had that same issue but unfortunatly, the thread
doesn't end with a solution but on the other hand people didn't answer
or continue the discussion so there is probably a solution :-)
Some examples
