> Cheers,Roberto
> From: Roberto Cortez
>
> To: "users@openjpa.apache.org"
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 1:58 AM
> Subject: Re: OpenJPA support for JPA 2.1: when?
>
> Hi guys,
> Started some work on the schema generation
> features:https://issues
ou!
Cheers,Roberto
From: Roberto Cortez
To: "users@openjpa.apache.org"
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 1:58 AM
Subject: Re: OpenJPA support for JPA 2.1: when?
Hi guys,
Started some work on the schema generation
features:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2554
Woul
7:20 PM
Subject: Re: OpenJPA support for JPA 2.1: when?
May of JPA 2.1 have been developed on the branch Kevin had mentioned. As it
was quite a while I had looked at beautiful OpenJPA code (i am now a FOB in
the wobbly-goobly-gook Python/Shell Script world filled with super-wizards
:), the
May of JPA 2.1 have been developed on the branch Kevin had mentioned. As it
was quite a while I had looked at beautiful OpenJPA code (i am now a FOB in
the wobbly-goobly-gook Python/Shell Script world filled with super-wizards
:), the exact features I had implemented on that branch escapes me.
The
ers
> Cc: Pinaki Poddar
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 3:09 PM
> Subject: Re: OpenJPA support for JPA 2.1: when?
>
> For those that are interested in this development effort, please take a
> look at the jpa-2.1 development tasks[1]. There are some low hanging prelim
>
not a committer, should I just send the patches
for the code?
Cheers,Roberto
From: Rick Curtis
To: users
Cc: Pinaki Poddar
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: OpenJPA support for JPA 2.1: when?
For those that are interested in this development effort, please t
For those that are interested in this development effort, please take a
look at the jpa-2.1 development tasks[1]. There are some low hanging prelim
tasks that need to get taken care of prior to any real 2.1 work happening.
Pinaki -- I see you created a 2.1 development sandbox, do you have any info
On Dec 8, 2014, at 11:55 AM, David Blevins wrote:
> Throwing this out there as it never hurts to be explicit.
>
> On the Tomitribe side I'm willing to hire someone to work on OpenJPA
> full-time if there are enough users out there willing to share the cost of
> said developer.
>
> A full-time
Throwing this out there as it never hurts to be explicit.
On the Tomitribe side I'm willing to hire someone to work on OpenJPA full-time
if there are enough users out there willing to share the cost of said developer.
A full-time developer (or two) is really not that expensive when split 10
dif
Hi everyone,
I'm new around here, but I'm very interested in helping OpenJPA to comply
with the JPA 2.1 spec. Is someone already doing something?
Cheers,
Roberto
--
View this message in context:
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-tp7584157p7587446.html
Sent
Hi Kevin,
It's also hard for me to find the time in this project.
I am already a committer at the Maven which already takes quite a lot of my
spare time.
Maybe you should send such request to the mailing lists of those ASF
projects which use OpenJPA.
--
View this message in context:
http://ope
Hi,
Thanks for the note and reviving this thread... We are well aware of
TomEE's desire for JPA 2.1 support in OpenJPA. It would be great to see
JPA 2.1 support in OpenJPA. But, the community contributions in this arena
have been slim. This string of notes is one such plea, but there have been
Hello guys,
It looks like the TomEE server with Java EE 7 is waiting for OpenJPA release
supporting JPA 2.1.
How far is OpenJPA with JPA 2.1 support.
I appreciate. Thx,
--
View this message in context:
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/OpenJPA-support-for-JPA-2-1-when-tp7584157p7587287.html
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Pinaki Poddar wrote:
> While I will keep aside the later design principle for now, the former
> principle applies for the current topic. This forward-looking tendency can
> be observed when many "new" JPA features can be mapped onto "existing"
> OpenJPA features
Hi,
Matthew asks a pertinent question:
> When will OpenJPA support JPA 2.1?
Kevin's response is factual as well
> Pinaki has went so far to create a sandbox and start experimenting with an
> implementation. Again, he's a one-man show and can't do it all. Well, he
> probably could, but it wo
I'm not concerned about the fact that most OpenJPA committers are IBM
employees, but committership *is* de facto closed by the usual Apache
meritocracy principles.
If you don't get enough volunteers among Apache members for upgrading
OpenJPA to JPA 2.1, you might start thinking about making it eas
Hi Glen
It's not bad that in this project participate people form IBM, it's bad
that there are not people from other companies. As far as I notice
people form Oracle haven't participated in this project since OpenJPA 1.x.
Java belongs to big companies and in my country is very rarely some
sm
One concern I have for OpenJPA is that the vast majority of committers
are IBM or Oracle people, which can give pause to people thinking about
contributing (i.e., the impression that committership is closed to
IBMers or Oracle people alone), that they may be better off submitting
patches to ano
Hi Kevin
I think that OpenJPA is great and the way it stuck to JPA 2.0 Standard
so quick was very good. As I am looking more and more into the JEE and
the desktop side of things is just as important to me, world it would be
great to keep the provider I know so well. I am may even be able to h
Hi Matthew,
I greatly appreciate your insights. And, I'm 100% behind you on this.
OpenJPA has a great, large set of users. We get feedback from all facets
of the industry and we try to respond to the best of our ability. Like the
squeaky wheel, we pay the most attention to those areas requesting
responses inline...
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
> Good question, Matthew. This has been brought up a couple of different
> times...
>
> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/JPA-2-1-td7215602.html
>
> http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-JPA-2-1-spec-implementat
Good question, Matthew. This has been brought up a couple of different
times...
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/JPA-2-1-td7215602.html
http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-JPA-2-1-spec-implementation-td7581978.html
So, there's been some interest, but not an overwhelming interest.
When will OpenJPA support JPA 2.1?
-matthew
--
mailto:matt...@matthewadams.me
skype:matthewadams12
googletalk:matt...@matthewadams.me
http://matthewadams.me
http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewadams
23 matches
Mail list logo
