, December 06, 2007 9:39 AM
To: users@openjpa.apache.org
Subject: RE: update query syntax for embedded class field
Thanks Michael. I will file a bug.
Meanwhile, is there a workaround for this?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Bouschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007
Jira issue created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-461
-Original Message-
From: Ajay Aggarwal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 9:39 AM
To: users@openjpa.apache.org
Subject: RE: update query syntax for embedded class field
Thanks Michael. I will
Thanks Michael. I will file a bug.
Meanwhile, is there a workaround for this?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Bouschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 5:59 PM
To: users@openjpa.apache.org
Subject: Re: update query syntax for embedded class field
Hi Ajay
I think we might only support setting top-level attributes, but you
are right: it does look like we are supposed to support navigation
through an arbitrary number of 1-1 relations.
On Dec 5, 2007, at 2:59 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote:
Hi Ajay Aggarwal,
I think your query is correct and sh
Hi Ajay Aggarwal,
I think your query is correct and should work. According to the Java
Persistence query language BNF the expression following the keyword SET
might be a state_field and state_field includes navigation through an
embedded:
state_field ::= {embedded_class_state_field.}*simple_s
