Hi,
One Q on the Layer.Text;
this one works:
var newl = new OpenLayers.Layer.Text( "My Points", {
location:"./textfile.txt"} );
this one doesn't:
var newl = new OpenLayers.Layer.Text( "My Points", {
location:"http://cosca-dlsu-cwts.wikispaces.com/space/showimage/textfile.txt"}
);
cheers,
manin
Jonz,
I think you could create a tilecache layer that does this. I have to do a
similar thing because part of my stuff is in EPSG:4326 and other stuff is in
UTM NADS83.
You would create your own layer class in tilecache.
Convert the WMS request to UTM and submit another WMS request.
Return the
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 06:07:18AM -0700, jonz wrote:
> Any ideas or comments?
"Wow, that sucks." :)
Seems like you've done the best you can -- I don't have any particular
advice for you, but I'm sorry you have to deal with a system like that.
Regards,
--
Christopher Schmidt
MetaCarta
_
You're right Chris, sorry.
I was in an old version of the spec on geojson.org.
Best regards,
Bart
--
Bart van den Eijnden
OSGIS, Open Source GIS
http://www.osgis.nl
- Oorspronkelijk bericht
Van: Chris Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Naar: Bart van den Eijnden OSGIS <[EMAIL PROTECTE
As far as I know set the option sphericalMercator:false on the Google layer,
and it will be display in lonlat.
Because commercial layers uses a spherical model of the Earth, they won't
line up correctly with you WMS layers in EPSG:4326, which uses an
ellipsoidal geometric model. You will see a shif
Er, I'm pretty sure GeoServer is wrong, we just this week got around to
updating to the latest geojson spec, I think it's in svn, but not
released yet. OpenLayers has definitely been ahead of us on spec
implementation.
Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS) wrote:
Hi list,
when trying the Geoserver G
Hi list,
when trying the Geoserver GeoJSON output against OpenLayers it does not work
out of the box.
Geoserver outputs
{"type":"FeatureCollection","members":[{
whereas OpenLayers expects:
{"type":"FeatureCollection","features":[{
Looking at the last GeoJSON spec Geoserver seems to be in the
Hi all..
I was looking for a confirmation or advice on a recent implementation (not
yet visibile via internet) using OL.
I was given the constraint that I have to use mapping web services provided
by Via Michelin. I built a minimal (really minimal!!) WMS interface over
it. Unfortunately their
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 11:26:48AM +0200, Lourens Veen wrote:
> The legal stuff (I know, it's almost longer than the patch itself and the
> patch may not even be copyrightable, but I always prefer to keep legal issues
> overly clear. You never know when someone will start making wild claims about
On Friday 19 October 2007 09:47:49 Lourens Veen wrote:
> On Thursday 18 October 2007 21:00:26 vgvallee wrote:
> > Lourens Veen-2 wrote:
> > > ...I've changed the WFS class to accept a "filter" option to which you
> > > can add an OGC Filter XML filter specification fragment. If you don't,
> > > the
On Thursday 18 October 2007 21:00:26 vgvallee wrote:
> Lourens Veen-2 wrote:
> > ...I've changed the WFS class to accept a "filter" option to which you
> > can add an OGC Filter XML filter specification fragment. If you don't,
> > then the code will send the BBOX constraint as before, if you do the
hi all,
I'm currently working on an OL with a few WMS layers:
http://rips-uis.lubw.baden-wuerttemberg.de/rips/wms_viewer/test/myOpenLayer.php
like you can see the user has the possibility to select the base layer between
google maps, ve or yahoo or others.
the problem is that the wms layers a
12 matches
Mail list logo
