On Dec 30, 2007 8:46 PM, Gregor Mosheh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Lemoine wrote:
> >> It's still using MapServer, so changing layer type shouldn't make a
> >> difference.
> > Hmm you may be right, but it is also possible that mapserv runs faster
> > if one uses its private, non-standard API.
Eric Lemoine wrote:
>> It's still using MapServer, so changing layer type shouldn't make a
>> difference.
> Hmm you may be right, but it is also possible that mapserv runs faster
> if one uses its private, non-standard API.
Actually, I ran speed tests a few months back, with 4.8 and again with
5.
On Dec 28, 2007 5:54 PM, David William Bitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's still using MapServer, so changing layer type shouldn't make a
> difference.
Hmm you may be right, but it is also possible that mapserv runs faster
if one uses its private, non-standard API.
> Tuning your MapServer by
On Dec 28, 2007 5:47 PM, Maria Panagou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've declared a wms layer using the following syntax, which works fine.
>
> var quakes = new OpenLayers.Layer.WMS( "Earthquakes",
> "http://127.0.0.1:80/cgi-bin/mapserv.exe?";,
>
It's still using MapServer, so changing layer type shouldn't make a
difference. Tuning your MapServer by creating indexing, scale dependent
layering, generalizing, etc. will be the things that will make your
MapServer faster. Alternatively (or in addition) you could look into a
tiling engine like
I've declared a wms layer using the following syntax, which works fine.
var quakes = new OpenLayers.Layer.WMS( "Earthquakes",
"http://127.0.0.1:80/cgi-bin/mapserv.exe?";,
{ map: '../htdocs/mpanagou/Quakes original.map',