Re: [OpenLayers-Users] OpenLayers.js with #1836 patch

2009-09-10 Thread Philip Bruvoll
this definition by 10 will also fix the problem. Kind regards, Philip > Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:39:23 +0200 > From: ahoce...@opengeo.org > CC: users@openlayers.org > Subject: Re: [OpenLayers-Users] OpenLayers.js with #1836 patch > > Mike Adair wrote: > > If I recall correct

Re: [OpenLayers-Users] OpenLayers.js with #1836 patch

2009-09-09 Thread Andreas Hocevar
Mike Adair wrote: > If I recall correctly when I was doing something similar, IE didn't > accept fractions in the symbol definition. Scaling it up so that all > points were integers solved the problem. > Good point Mike. Now that you mention it, I think I stumbled across the very same issue

Re: [OpenLayers-Users] OpenLayers.js with #1836 patch

2009-09-09 Thread Mike Adair
If I recall correctly when I was doing something similar, IE didn't accept fractions in the symbol definition. Scaling it up so that all points were integers solved the problem. Mike Andreas Hocevar wrote: > Thanks for the symbol defs, these still render incorrectly in IE indeed. > > #1836 nee

Re: [OpenLayers-Users] OpenLayers.js with #1836 patch

2009-09-09 Thread Andreas Hocevar
Thanks for the symbol defs, these still render incorrectly in IE indeed. #1836 needs more work. Patches welcome :-) Regards, Andreas. Philip Bruvoll wrote: > Thank you for the patch :) > I have just tried it out. > It seems that a symbol defined by [2,0, 4,5, 0,5, 2,0] now renders with > correc