y.net
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Joanne Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: users@openlayers.org
Sent: 08 August 2007 17:33:34 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London
Subject: Re: [OpenLayers-Users] single file library distorts si
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 11:32:14AM +0100, Joanne Cook wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I am experimenting with the compressed single file version of OpenLayers and
> have come across a couple of issues with the size of the markers I use for
> wfs. I'm sure there's a simple reason for it but I can't figure
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 04:04:47PM +0100, Joanne Cook wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> Thanks for getting back to me. I am pretty certain that I haven't made any
> other changes- in fact I downloaded 2.4 to check!
>
> When you zoom into the 2.4 uncompressed version, do you see semi-transparent
> orange c
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Uzureau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Joanne Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: users@openlayers.org
Sent: 08 August 2007 15:24:37 o'clock (GMT) Europe/London
Subject: Re: [OpenLayers-Users] single file library distorts size of markers?
Joanne,
In the 2.4 uncompressed link you send, I am able to see the markers
when I zoom in (although they are displayed as vector data).
I checked out the two different versions of 2.3 and they are indeed
different, though It seems very bizarre to me that this would be
happening only because of t
Hi List,
I am experimenting with the compressed single file version of OpenLayers and
have come across a couple of issues with the size of the markers I use for wfs.
I'm sure there's a simple reason for it but I can't figure it out.
I have replaced the default marker (/img/marker.png) with a cu
