Ray Jahn wrote:
> From within a Calc spreadsheet cell,
> 1. Is it possible to directly call OO BeanShell routines,
>similar to OO Basic?
Niklas Nebel wrote:
> The mechanism that is used for Basic functions supports only Basic.
The
> other way to call functions is Add-Ins, for which you must
Hi:
There are web pages to submit OO issues when one logs in with OO ID. Wonder if
there are web pages to submit messages to OO mail lists when one logs in with
OO ID?
The idea is to keep all my interaction with OO under one ID. One does not need
to remember with which e-mail account the pre
OO: 1.9.100
script library: "my macros" in OO basic
PC: MS Windows 2000
Found out that "my macros" is stored in
...\user\basic\standard
Seems that the 1.9.100 installation only transfers contents of 1.1.x. Contents
for versions between 1.1.x and 1.9.100 are ignored and not transferred.
--
OO: 1.9.100
script library: "my macros" in OO basic
PC: MS Windows 2000
remove 1.9.95
install 1.9.100
answer yes to "transfer personal file"
create a calc file
tools - macros - organize macros - basic
empty content in "my macros" library
The content of "my macros" in 1.9.95 is not transferred.
possibly related OO issue 48147
PC: MS Windows 2000
OO: 1.9.100
unzip
open both OO files
enable both scripts (empty) during open operation
tools - macros - organize macros - basic
select organizer button
3 user modules instead of 2
duplicate module of the 2nd file in display list
Is there any iss
Thanks to the explanation by Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and Mathias Bauer.
Scope: global vs. local vs. any other
Are all objects returned by CreateUnoService() global objects and therefore not
to be disposed of by users? If the answer is dependent on the exact service
requested, is there a documen
Dear CPH:
OO issue 48147, per your instruction. Thanks for direction.
Ray
-Original Message-
From: CPHennessy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 06:29 PM
To: users@openoffice.org; Jahn, Ray (R.)
Subject: 1.9.95 script library name ambiguity
On Monday 25 April 2005
efficiency concern if the same service is created repetitively? (related
questions on object integrity and memory management go on).
Thanks again.
Ray
-Original Message-
From: Kohei Yoshida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 03:44 PM
To: dev@sc.openoffice.org; Jahn, Ray
Hi:
The attached zip file contains two spreadsheet files: junk.sxc and junk.ods.
* use 1.9.95
* open both files
* Tools - Macros - Organize Macros
* two libaries of identical display names
due to the suppresion of file name extension
Regards,
Ray
-
Hi:
OS = MS Windows 2000
in OO Basic inside OO Calc 1.9.95
writedbginfo( sheet_object ) indicates no
FunctionAccess service
XFunctionAccess interface
in DeveloperGuide, version 2.0
8.4.2 Function Handling
com.sun.star.sheet.FunctionAccess service
com.sun.star.sheet.XFunctionAccess interface
I
10 matches
Mail list logo