[users] Re: RHEL OO 2.0 installation won't run

2006-01-31 Thread Rex Dieter
Jeff Boes wrote: I installed OpenOffice 2.0 on my RHEL 4 system from RPMs. I removed the 1.1 RPMs first. I wanted the new installation in the /usr/local directory, so I did: $ rpm -Uvh --prefix /usr/local/openoffice *.rpm Not supported, and doesn't work, as you found out. Uninstall, (re)insta

[users] Re: ORCA and MSI installer

2006-01-06 Thread Rex Dieter
Marvin Pillers wrote: Has anyone used Orca to modify the install .MSI file for Windows for OpenOffice 2.0? Yes. We need an install version for school that bypasses the license setup, registration screen, sets the Load/Save features for MS Office and selects the default file save as features.

[users] Re: OOo 2.0 desktop integration on Fedora Core 4

2005-11-21 Thread Rex Dieter
Pierre Thibaudeau wrote: I have installed OOo 2.0 along with openoffice.org-redhat-menus-2.0.0-3.noarch.rpm on both Fedora Core 3 & 4. No problem on FC3 (gnome 2.8.0) but the icons dont show up in the menu on FC4 (gnome 2.10.0), although they are actually installed (just like in FC3) in /usr

[users] Re: Base is too slow

2005-10-22 Thread Rex Dieter
G. Roderick Singleton wrote: On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 20:33 +0100, Paul Smith wrote: Dear All I have noticed that Base is quite slow when, for instance, I click on the button "Tables" by the first time. Is there some way of improving that? (I am using OOo 1.9.125 on Fedora Core 4.) I would rec

[users] Re: Installation just doesn't work....

2005-10-21 Thread Rex Dieter
Olivia Jensen wrote: I tried to hack it into the 21st century by changing the *.rpm model into a *.tar.gz one. I don't and we won't, here, use the dreadful distributions of linux that you seem to have chosen to support... well we might allow/tolerate Mandrake. We scratch RedHat and Fedora fro

[users] Re: The package management choice does not make sense ...

2005-10-21 Thread Rex Dieter
Madhusudan Singh wrote: ... given the current realities. Since the Linux Standard Base requires support for RPM, IMO, the choice of packaging *does* make sense. -- Rex - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additio

[users] Re: 1.9.122 under Windows: UI very slow

2005-08-08 Thread Rex Dieter
Rex Dieter wrote: Severin Greimel wrote: I have version 1.9.122 running on a Windows machine and the menus react very slowly, pretty much unusably slowly I've found the ooo-1.9.x betas to run excruciatingly slow when/if you're using Folder Redirection on users' Applicat

[users] Re: 1.9.122 under Windows: UI very slow

2005-08-05 Thread Rex Dieter
Rudy Reveles wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: >> I've found the ooo-1.9.x betas to run excruciatingly slow when/if >> you're using Folder Redirection on users' Application Data folder. Can you tell me what you mean by "Folder Redirection" on users'

[users] Re: 1.9.122 under Windows: UI very slow

2005-08-05 Thread Rex Dieter
Rudy Reveles wrote: Can you tell me what you mean by "Folder Redirection" on users' Application Daty folder? And another reference: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/library/ServerHelp/42607d0b-5d44-4f99-8992-d63b99320bb6.mspx -- Rex

[users] Re: 1.9.122 under Windows: UI very slow

2005-08-05 Thread Rex Dieter
Severin Greimel wrote: I have version 1.9.122 running on a Windows machine and the menus react very slowly, pretty much unusably slowly I've found the ooo-1.9.x betas to run excruciatingly slow when/if you're using Folder Redirection on users' Application Data folder. -- Rex

[users] Re: Will their be patches for final 2.0

2005-07-06 Thread Rex Dieter
Peter Kupfer OOo wrote: Robert Volke wrote: When OO version 2.0 does come out (fingers crossed - by the end of July), will there be patches and updates released for it or are we always going to have to uninstall the last version then install the newest version As with any software, we co

[users] Re: Can 2.0 use response files?

2005-07-06 Thread Rex Dieter
G. Roderick Singleton wrote: Now my question. Since installing 1.1.x with response files is and was an option, the use of native installers with 2.0 appears to preclude this option/ Is it still available? If not then what option(s) is available to duplicate this functionality? It's easy enough

[users] Re: fonts problem

2005-05-18 Thread Rex Dieter
Roy Short wrote: is there a posible way to make openoffice import or see or my windows xp fonts? If running openoffice on Windows, it should already/automatically set/use any installed font. Or do you mean when/if running on another platform, say linux? -- Rex ---

[users] Re: [moderated]Install OpenOffice 2.0

2005-03-10 Thread Rex Dieter
Rob wrote: My OS is SUSE 9.2 and i've got all rpm-files but giving rpm -Uvih *rpm it stops with the message error: Failed dependencies: suse-release conflicts with openofficeorg-redhat-menus-1.9.79-1 Please give me advice, because I'am a starter with Linux, Easy. Don't try to install open

[users] Re: OO 1.1.0 rpm

2005-01-18 Thread Rex Dieter
Chris Aitken wrote: Where can I download an rpm to install OO 1.1.0 onto an rh 8.0 box? Here's ooo-1.1.2 for rh80: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/8.0/RPMS.stable/ (Though kde-redhat will be completely dropping rh80 support soon). -- Rex ---