Re: [users] outline numbering - related to Outlining?

James wrote: > On 10/14/09 00:02, Barbara Duprey wrote: >> James wrote: >>> I'm having numbering problems. :-( >>> >>> lockie.ca/test/OOoutline.odt >>> >>> Highlight the first line and select the Heading1 style. >>> Second line gets Heading2. >>> Third line gets Heading1. >>> Fourth line gets Headi

Re: [users] Zooming problem on MacBook Pro

Mike Shearer wrote: > Dave Post wrote: >> On Jul 16, 2009, at 12:10 AM, Mike Shearer wrote: >> >>> Than ks Dave, but there's no OSX control that seems relevant to the >>> problem. >> >> If there's a feature in OO that might be responsible, perhaps someone >> who knows of it will respond. Meanwhile,

Re: [users] Base 3 - Lost Relationships and "out of memory"

ntime environment based on OpenJDK 6 and IcedTea 6 java-1_6_0-openjdk-plugin - Java web browser plugin based on OpenJDK 6 and IcedTea 6 Drew Jensen wrote: > lllact...@gmx.net wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying the new OOo 3.0 Base in stead of Access 2007. >> &

Re: [users] Opening the same document twice on cifs share

Tobias Daub wrote: > Hi Al, > > After some testing, I came to this conclusion (Client1 always opens > first): > > Client1 > > > > Client2 > > > > Result > > > OS: Win XP Pro SP3 > > Typ: XLS > > Vers.: Excel 2002 > > > > OS: Win XP Pro SP3 > > Typ: XLS > > Vers.: OOo 3.0.1 > > >

Re: [users] Opening the same document twice on cifs share

Tobias Daub wrote: > Hi There, > > We experienced the problem that some users were opening the same Excel > document on a CIFS share at the same time. One was using MS Excel, the > other one OpenOffice. This happend by accident. At the end, both > weren't able to save it. > > What can I do to preve

Re: [users] Acrobat Reader (was Re: [users] ver 3 is rubbish)

Dave Post wrote: > On Feb 28, 2009, at 8:33 AM, lllact...@gmx.net wrote: > >> We had such problems with Adobe's PDF acroread, which seemed to cause >> the slowing down of not only OOo 3.0.1. After removing Adobe acroread >> (to not come into the temptation to start

Re: [users] ver 3 is rubbish.

David B Teague wrote: > > OO.o 3.0.0 was slow on startup, and 3.0.1 is also slow to start, > slower than 2.4, even with the "QuickStarter" -- which appears only to > suppress the splash screen. I'm hoping that 3.1.0 will be > significantly better. I just has to be better. > > Occasionally OO.o stop

Re: [users] OT. Nokia Phones and Linux

Harold Fuchs wrote: > 2009/2/16 Dotan Cohen > > > > >> The Nokia software only works on Windows (and needs admin access!) so >> I have to bug someone about letting me install it on their system, ie, >> >> > > This may be of interest: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=2275758 > > Ap

Re: [users] troll !! (was WHAT'S UP WITH YOUR B.S.?)

Flem D. Williams wrote: > WHAT'S UP WITH THIS DOWNLOAD CRAP? > > For more than five hours I've started the download for OpenOffice3. > Each and every time, this damn download hangs, stops, or crashes around 28% > of completion. > After this, the whole operation is frozen into a dead state where

Re: [users] Base 3 - Lost Relationships and "out of memory" - Java problem or Bug?

Drew Jensen wrote: > OK, another question. > > If you open the java options dialog. > Tools>Options>OpenOffice.org>Jave > > Which of the java runtimes...(then again I guess you said that you now only > have one) > > Well, Ubuntu hasn't released the 3.0 yet in the repositories - but I can > instal