Re: [users] Re: A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection (was Re: Open Office and Vista)

2007-03-07 Thread Tom Chilton
lol On 7 Mar 2007, at 22:40, NoOp wrote: On 03/07/2007 01:29 PM, Harold Fuchs wrote: Tom Chilton wrote: MIT "academic" enough? Unfortunately not, as far as I can tell none of these sources have undergone an independent review process, but rather are MIT's strategy for 'dealing' with the (*ah

[users] Re: A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection (was Re: Open Office and Vista)

2007-03-07 Thread NoOp
On 03/07/2007 01:29 PM, Harold Fuchs wrote: > Tom Chilton wrote: > >> MIT "academic" enough? > > > > Unfortunately not, as far as I can tell none of these sources have > > undergone an independent review process, but rather are MIT's > > strategy for 'dealing' with the (*ahem* problem of) Vist