I hope this thread,if it continues, will move to discuss list, where it
belonged in the first place.
MJN
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I mostly use the signature of my mail to do some positive explanation,
like - in (double) Dutch:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - oo.o - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Door mij verzonden office-documenten zijn gemaakt in OpenOffice.org: -
- *Handig * Modern * Professioneel * Compatibel * Géén
I think this in general is a great idea. However, I would /suggest/,
instead of sending them a file. "If you can't open this, fix it.
Download a better office suite." Personally I think that MSO is great.
As long as you don't have to pay for it out of your own wallet. :-D I
have been quite successf
Robin Laing wrote:
But isn't there prior art to this? Was M$ involved with the development
of XML? Hasn't SUN got a leg to stand on?
Yes, of course there's prior art. In a just world, if Microsoft even
tried to enforce this blatantly improper patent, they'd be liable to
prosecution, and their
Rod Engelsman wrote:
Steve C. Thompson wrote:
Still, the latest MS .docs are XML and therefore should be relatively
easy to support with any Word Processor.
Yeah, except for
``Patent 525484, accepted by the office and now open for objections
until the end of May, says Microsoft invented and o
Steve C. Thompson wrote:
Still, the latest MS .docs are XML and therefore should be relatively easy to
support with any Word Processor.
Yeah, except for
``Patent 525484, accepted by the office and now open for objections
until the end of May, says Microsoft invented and owns the process
w
