On 04/12/2007 03:00 PM, PSC Inc wrote:
Sorry hewnix:
I do not know where you got your information, but you are incorrect.
Outlook comes as part of even the most basic version of OFFICE, not the
operating system. Again, MS OUTLOOK is part of OFFICE, not Windows.
Umm... it's *not* included in
Douglas Hinds keyed the following on 4/9/2007 2:21 PM:
PJH wrote:
The main reason Outlook is my choice is its integration of
calendar, contacts, e-mails, documents, and tasks (to-dos). You
can create a task and attach to it any relevant information
including documents, e-mails, contact info
On 04/09/2007 04:56 PM, PJH wrote:
I have heard all the arguments as to why no one needs Outlook, but last
night,
my niece, a very smart person (full scholarship to MIT, MSCompSci at Berkeley
paid for by Bell Labs, etc.) gave me her reasons for using Outlook.
[snip]
Pre-Outlook, I
On 04/10/2007 10:56 AM, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote:
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 13:17, my mailbox was graced by a missive
from Chris Cioffi [EMAIL PROTECTED] who wrote:
While not everyone needs all the languages, many people (especially in
Europe) are multi-lingual and benefit from having
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 18:14 -0700, NoOp wrote:
On 04/09/2007 04:56 PM, PJH wrote:
I have heard all the arguments as to why no one needs Outlook, but last
night,
my niece, a very smart person (full scholarship to MIT, MSCompSci at
Berkeley
paid for by Bell Labs, etc.) gave me her
