[users] 1.9.109 less stable than 1.9.104

2005-07-02 Thread David Teague
I hope 1.9.109 is still current. I have been out of the circuit for a couple of weeks. I run XP, SP 1, 750 KHz Athlon, 266 MHz front side bus 1 MB DDS RAM and Firefox browser. With OO.o 1.9.109, when writer is left open, say I use it for a couple of hours, then leave it running overnight --

Re: [users] 1.9.109 less stable than 1.9.104

2005-07-02 Thread John W. Kennedy
David Teague wrote: I hope 1.9.109 is still current. I have been out of the circuit for a couple of weeks. 1.9.113 is out now. -- John W. Kennedy "Information is light. Information, in itself, about anything, is light." -- Tom Stoppard. "Night and Day"

Re: [users] 1.9.109 less stable than 1.9.104

2005-07-02 Thread John Jordan
On 2 Jul 2005, at 11:24, John W. Kennedy wrote: > 1.9.113 is out now. But still no way to install it on Debian. (The instructions do not work.) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMA

Re: [users] 1.9.109 less stable than 1.9.104

2005-07-02 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 10:45 -0700, John Jordan wrote: > On 2 Jul 2005, at 11:24, John W. Kennedy wrote: > > > 1.9.113 is out now. > > But still no way to install it on Debian. (The instructions do not work.) > What instructions? Those in the SETUP GUIDE or some instructions you got elsewhere?

Re: [users] 1.9.109 less stable than 1.9.104

2005-07-02 Thread David Teague
> I said: > > I hope 1.9.109 is still current. I have been out of the > > circuit for a couple of weeks. John W Kennedy answered: > 1.9.113 is out now. Thanks. I fetched and installed it. David Teague, http://cs.wcu.edu/~dbt Advocating Free Software and Double Bass tuned in fifths www.de

Re: [users] 1.9.109 less stable than 1.9.104

2005-07-02 Thread John Jordan
On 2 Jul 2005, at 13:57, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 10:45 -0700, John Jordan wrote: > > On 2 Jul 2005, at 11:24, John W. Kennedy wrote: > > > > > 1.9.113 is out now. > > > > But still no way to install it on Debian. (The instructions do not work.) > > > > What instr

Re: [users] 1.9.109 less stable than 1.9.104

2005-07-02 Thread G. Roderick Singleton
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 12:01 -0700, John Jordan wrote: > On 2 Jul 2005, at 13:57, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > > On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 10:45 -0700, John Jordan wrote: > > > On 2 Jul 2005, at 11:24, John W. Kennedy wrote: > > > > > > > 1.9.113 is out now. > > > > > > But still no way to insta

Re: [users] 1.9.109 less stable than 1.9.104

2005-07-02 Thread Greg Madden
On Saturday 02 July 2005 11:01 am, John Jordan wrote: > On 2 Jul 2005, at 13:57, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 10:45 -0700, John Jordan wrote: > > > On 2 Jul 2005, at 11:24, John W. Kennedy wrote: > > > > 1.9.113 is out now. > > > > > > But still no way to install it on Deb

Re: [users] 1.9.109 less stable than 1.9.104

2005-07-02 Thread John Jordan
On 2 Jul 2005, at 13:12, Greg Madden wrote: > Synaptic is using sources that are not related to OO.org so asking on > the appropriate distro list may help, though I follow the Ubuntu & > Debian AMD64 lists for info on OO and have yet to see anything concrete > on when a 64bit version will be a

Re: [users] 1.9.109 less stable than 1.9.104

2005-07-02 Thread Greg Madden
On Saturday 02 July 2005 08:12 pm, John Jordan wrote: > On 2 Jul 2005, at 13:12, Greg Madden wrote: > > Synaptic is using sources that are not related to OO.org so asking > > on the appropriate distro list may help, though I follow the Ubuntu > > & Debian AMD64 lists for info on OO and have yet to