On 28/03/2008 18:09, Howard wrote:
I downloaded the new version but got an messgeas it was installing to put the
cd in for v 2,3!
Why would I need that if the v is 2.4?
Does anyone know ?
We already replied to you.
--
Harold Fuchs
London, England
Please reply *only* to
I didn`t see any reply from my first query.
- Original Message -
From: Harold Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 3:02 PM
Subject: [users] Already Solved in Response to a Different email with the
Same Question - was: [users] Problem
On
On Friday 28 March 2008 21:47:21 Howard wrote:
I didn`t see any reply from my first query.
There was a gap between your emails of a mere 5 and a half hours.
Some of us sleep sometimes. Some of us work and eat and visit friends. Some
of us don't know the answer so don't answer. Probably some
On 28/03/2008 21:47, Howard wrote:
I didn`t see any reply from my first query.
Yes you did. You replied to it.
--
Harold Fuchs
London, England
Please reply *only* to users@openoffice.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:02:23 +
Harold Fuchs wrote:
On 28/03/2008 18:09, Howard wrote:
I downloaded the new version but got an messgeas it was installing
to put the cd in for v 2,3!
Why would I need that if the v is 2.4?
Does anyone know ?
We already replied to you.
But
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 13:32:14 +1200
Michael Adams wrote:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:02:23 +
Harold Fuchs wrote:
On 28/03/2008 18:09, Howard wrote:
I downloaded the new version but got an messgeas it was installing
to put the cd in for v 2,3!
Why would I need that if the v is 2.4?
I did?Shows how good my memory is.LOL!
- Original Message -
From: Harold Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@openoffice.org
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: [users] Already Solved in Response to a Different email with
the Same Question - was: [users] Problem
On 28/03/2008
