--- Olivia Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wouldn't want their standard installation either.
> I want software
> to reside where I put it and there to stand alone --
> untangled into
> the system. I don't/won't load, for example,
> Netscape or Firefox or
> RealPlayer or Opera (trash anyw
On Sat October 22 2005 16:44, + Olivia Jensen wrote:
> I don't want my systems to look like yours.
And it's fair to say that the vast majority of people who know what they are
doing would not like a system link yours. Best of luck with it.
--
CPH : openoffice.org contributor
Maybe your questio
I wouldn't want their standard installation either. I want software
to reside where I put it and there to stand alone -- untangled into
the system. I don't/won't load, for example, Netscape or Firefox or
RealPlayer or Opera (trash anyway) into their intended directories
because it screws up the s
On Fri October 21 2005 03:23, + Olivia Jensen wrote:
> [ MODERATED ] ***
> I've spent about 3 hours trying to install version 2.0 on my office
> linux system. Because your current version uses the incredibly
> primitive *.rpm installer,
Please contact your Linux distributor
What mirror did you download from I got a tar.gz archive from secs-up,
Paul Sutton
Andrew Fisk wrote:
I have been watching this list for quite a while, and have never seen
anyone else with this kind of problem, I am sure that you have built
a decent solid system for your self at the expens
I have been watching this list for quite a while, and have never seen
anyone else with this kind of problem, I am sure that you have built
a decent solid system for your self at the expense of having the
software needed by the 2.0 on your machine.
Quit whining and install MSO on your linux
I've spent about 3 hours trying to install version 2.0 on my office
linux system. Because your current version uses the incredibly
primitive *.rpm installer, I tried to hack it into the 21st century by
changing the *.rpm model into a *.tar.gz one. I don't and we won't,
here, use the dreadful dis
