Re: [users] Issue with 2.0.3 with sending document as PDF attachment

2006-09-14 Thread Terry
2.0.3 seems to have incorporated a number of bugs and bad development decisions. Have they been offset by some remarkable improvements? If not, 2.0.2 should still be available on the mirrors. Richard Detwiler wrote: A co-worker brought an issue with 2.0.3 to my attention today. She has notice

Re: [users] Issue with 2.0.3 with sending document as PDF attachment

2006-09-14 Thread Johnny Andersson
2006/9/14, Enno Fennema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Johnny Andersson wrote: > Maybe someone could write a macro that first exports the selected > portion to > PDF and then sends it... > > Regards > > > Johnny > > > 2006/9/13, Giuseppe Castagno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> >> Hi Richard, >> >> On 9/13/06,

Re: [users] Issue with 2.0.3 with sending document as PDF attachment

2006-09-14 Thread Enno Fennema
Johnny Andersson wrote: Maybe someone could write a macro that first exports the selected portion to PDF and then sends it... Regards Johnny 2006/9/13, Giuseppe Castagno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Richard, On 9/13/06, Richard Detwiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A co-worker brought an is

Re: [users] Issue with 2.0.3 with sending document as PDF attachment

2006-09-13 Thread Giuseppe Castagno
Hi Richard, On 9/13/06, Richard Detwiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A co-worker brought an issue with 2.0.3 to my attention today. She has noticed that, since we've upgraded to 2.0.3, when sending a document as a PDF attachment, she does not encounter the screen where she can select whether to e

Re: [users] Issue with 2.0.3 with sending document as PDF attachment

2006-09-13 Thread Harold Fuchs
On Wednesday, September 13, 2006 3:38 AM [GMT+1=CET], Richard Detwiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also verified that File > Export works as it should. > That is certainly a work-around, but it involves a > number of additional steps compared to File > Send > > Email as PDF. Especially sin