Per wrote:
I think that Bill Gates personally i putting glue in every box with
Vista that Microsoft (not M$ is shipping) to make OOo to run
slower. ;-)
or is it that the code in OOo isn´t optimized.. (but it runs slower on
WIN-machines !!! ) yeah, okey and there are aliens amoung us too.
I think that Bill Gates personally i putting glue in every box with
Vista that Microsoft (not M$ is shipping) to make OOo to run slower.
;-)
or is it that the code in OOo isn´t optimized.. (but it runs slower on
WIN-machines !!! ) yeah, okey and there are aliens amoung us too :-\
Is
Kirill S. Palagin wrote:
-Original Message-
From: James Knott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 3:47 PM
Don't forget, MS has done in the past and apparently still
doing, is using hidden API, that give their own apps better
performance.
Can y
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Smits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 1:45 AM
> >
> both running on XP. Who knows what extra overhead is caused
> by Vista, and who knows what extra overhead is added because
> M$ is deliberately trying to make OO run slowly.
2007/5/1, Kirill S. Palagin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -Original Message-
> From: James Knott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 3:47 PM
> >
> Don't forget, MS has done in the past and apparently still
> doing, is using hidden API, that give their own apps better
> perf
> -Original Message-
> From: James Knott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 3:47 PM
> >
> Don't forget, MS has done in the past and apparently still
> doing, is using hidden API, that give their own apps better
> performance.
Can you prove your assertions?
>
On Saturday 28 April 2007 20:21, Michael Adams wrote:
>
> These tests come up from time to time and should always be seen in
> perspective. Both use two different models.
>
> Microsoft Office
>
> 1. Starts one application at a time
> 2. Works on Microsoft Windows
>
>
> OpenOffice.
Kirill S. Palagin wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: James Knott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 11:46 PM
>>
>
>
utility. A while ago, I was providing Windows support to a very
large company. Crashed PST files were a frequent complaint.
>>>
> -Original Message-
> From: James Knott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 11:46 PM
> >> utility. A while ago, I was providing Windows support to a very
> >> large company. Crashed PST files were a frequent complaint.
> >>
> >
> > Very large companies store
Kirill S. Palagin wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: James Knott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 7:26 PM
>>
>> Another reason to "love" MS Office, is the PST files used in Outlook.
>>
>
> I am wondering what Outlook has to do with OpenOffice?
>
Well, p
> -Original Message-
> From: James Knott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 7:26 PM
>
> Another reason to "love" MS Office, is the PST files used in Outlook.
I am wondering what Outlook has to do with OpenOffice?
> They have a tendency to corrupt when they get too
> -Original Message-
> From: James Knott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 4:02 PM
>
> I have never seen OO crash, either on Windows or Linux.
Here is your chance
http://www.openoffice.org/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/43224/spo_tha_
270_0_9018233.xls
Have fun.
Johnny Andersson wrote:
> 2007/4/29, James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> Kirill S. Palagin wrote:
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: Michael Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 7:22 AM
>> >> To: users@openoffice.org
>> >>
>> >> Microsoft Office
>> >>
>>
2007/4/29, James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Kirill S. Palagin wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Michael Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 7:22 AM
>> To: users@openoffice.org
>>
>> Microsoft Office
>>
>>
>
> I do not give a damn about their office, becau
Kirill S. Palagin wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Michael Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 7:22 AM
>> To: users@openoffice.org
>>
>> Microsoft Office
>>
>>
>
> I do not give a damn about their office, because I do not generally use
> it.
>
>
>>
Michael Adams wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:05:33 -0400
> Fred A. Miller wrote:
>
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> In George Ou's latest head-to-head test results, a slightly slimmed
>> down version of OpenOffice.org still consumes far more system
>> resources than M
2007/4/29, Kirill S. Palagin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 7:22 AM
> To: users@openoffice.org
>
> Microsoft Office
>
I do not give a damn about their office, because I do not generally use
it.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 7:22 AM
> To: users@openoffice.org
>
> Microsoft Office
>
I do not give a damn about their office, because I do not generally use
it.
> OpenOffice.org
> ==
> 1. Loads the core
Michael Adams wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:05:33 -0400
> Fred A. Miller wrote:
[snip]
> Microsoft Office
>
> 1. Starts one application at a time
> 2. Works on Microsoft Windows
>
>
> OpenOffice.org
> ==
> 1. Loads the core component to run all applications when t
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:05:33 -0400
Fred A. Miller wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> In George Ou's latest head-to-head test results, a slightly slimmed
> down version of OpenOffice.org still consumes far more system
> resources than Microsoft's feature-laden suite.
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In George Ou's latest head-to-head test results, a slightly slimmed down
version of OpenOffice.org still consumes far more system resources than
Microsoft's feature-laden suite.
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=480&tag=nl.e539
- --
This message originate
21 matches
Mail list logo
