On Monday 14 February 2005 15:10, Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote:
> Peter Kupfer wrote:
> > Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote:
>
> {BIG SNIP}
>
> > I know this is a nuisance, but as far as I can tell, it is the best
> > system for all. What would help most, is if people that are here a lot
> > would m
Peter Kupfer wrote:
Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote:
{BIG SNIP}
I know this is a nuisance, but as far as I can tell, it is the best
system for all. What would help most, is if people that are here a lot
would make sure that they cc unsubsribed users.
All noted and agreed Peter, but I wasn't taking
Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote:
Peter Kupfer wrote:
Hylton Conacher
It is not meant to be a calling out. I do it, because that is what
others do.
Aahh, 'the sheep thing'. :)
Just trying to help out.
It makes sense though. It explains why the user has an unexpected
e-mail from someone they haven't
On Sunday 06 February 2005 08:12, Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote:
> So as an example and to re-iterate my point:
> 1) An unsubbed user has a OOo problem and poses a question on the OOo
> website.
> 2) Their message is forwarded through to the [users] list and a message
> informing them that they ar
On Sunday 06 February 2005 08:12, Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote:
> > ... and some come
> > through with just the moderated subject, it would not work out
> > particularly well.
>
> Agreed it does not work too well :) Perhaps a RFE needs to be requested
> on the OOo site? Should I post one?
Pl
Peter Kupfer wrote:
Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote:
I have just seen another reason why I should migrate to Thunderbird
from Mozilla mail :), but
I wonder what the purpose is of telling the list subscribers that an
'unwashed' person is not subscribed. Personally I couldn't give a hoot
if the
Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote:
I have just seen another reason why I should migrate to Thunderbird from
Mozilla mail :), but
I wonder what the purpose is of telling the list subscribers that an
'unwashed' person is not subscribed. Personally I couldn't give a hoot
if they are or not.
It is
CPH wrote:
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 09:39, Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote:
[snip]
I wonder what the purpose is of telling the list subscribers that an
'unwashed' person is not subscribed. Personally I couldn't give a hoot
if they are or not.
If they have the opportunity to post to the list from
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 09:39, Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote:
> Crystle Numan wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 10:06 +1100, Brian wrote:
> >>Hi Crystle,
> >>
> >>I often see you forwarding posts with the message "As you are not
> >> subscribed, you may not have seen:", like the one below. Is t
Crystle Numan wrote:
On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 10:06 +1100, Brian wrote:
Hi Crystle,
I often see you forwarding posts with the message "As you are not subscribed, you
may not have seen:", like the one below.
Is there a better way for me/us to handle these?
When the subjecy contains [users][moderated]
Nicu Buculei wrote:
you should filter for 'Delivered-To' header, to see if it contain
'moderator'.
'Delivered-To' is not part of the default conditions list, so it
should be added using 'Customize'
Thankyou!
I must have looked right at "Customise" countless times without seeing it.
Brian
--
OpenO
Brian wrote:
Peter Kupfer wrote:
This is about right. I set up a filter in Thunderbird so all posts
from unsubsribed users show up as red so I remember to cc them without
having to look at the headers.
Seems I'm missing something in Thunderbird filters. My other filters
work ok.
How did you do
Peter Kupfer wrote:
This is about right. I set up a filter in Thunderbird so all posts
from unsubsribed users show up as red so I remember to cc them without
having to look at the headers.
Seems I'm missing something in Thunderbird filters. My other filters
work ok.
How did you do it - what did
Crystle Numan wrote:
On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 10:06 +1100, Brian wrote:
Brian:
(I'm replying to the list so that others will know).
Thanks for asking! I do this because I'm trying to help the moderators
(GRS & CPH). If I notice someone responds to another who is not
subscribed, I do this.
To tell if
On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 10:06 +1100, Brian wrote:
> Hi Crystle,
>
> I often see you forwarding posts with the message "As you are not subscribed,
> you may not have seen:", like the one below.
> Is there a better way for me/us to handle these?
> When the subjecy contains [users][moderated] should I
15 matches
Mail list logo
