[users] Re: Open Office for Windows 7

2010-03-24 Thread NoOp
On 03/24/2010 07:28 AM, Jan van Hoek wrote: Questions/suggestions: In the mean time, I combined all your hints: I upgraded Java to version 6 upd 18, and I downloaded an OOo installer executable without JRE. Both to no avail. In other words, I got stuck with OOo 3.1 (on this one PC

[users] Re: Open Office for Windows 7

2010-03-23 Thread NoOp
On 03/22/2010 04:58 AM, Jan van Hoek wrote: I've had no problems using OOo 3.1.1 I had neither, until... so OOo 3.2 (the current version) should work I've (re)tried to install OOo 3.2, but the install consistently just hangs and produces, while using 25% CPU for hours, no

[users] Re: Open Office for Windows 7

2010-03-23 Thread NoOp
On 03/23/2010 10:56 AM, Drew Jensen wrote: Hi, Not sure this will play in here - but the one thing I know of where OO.o on Windows 64 has a problem is Java. You must use a 32bit Java runtime with OO.o, a 64bit runtime will not work. Anyway - it is the only thing I could think of.

[users] Re: Open Office for Windows 7

2010-03-23 Thread NoOp
On 03/23/2010 11:32 AM, NoOp wrote: On 03/23/2010 10:56 AM, Drew Jensen wrote: Hi, Not sure this will play in here - but the one thing I know of where OO.o on Windows 64 has a problem is Java. You must use a 32bit Java runtime with OO.o, a 64bit runtime will not work. Anyway - it is

[users] Re: Open Office for Windows 7

2010-03-22 Thread NoOp
On 03/22/2010 09:53 AM, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote: On 22/03/2010 11:58, Jan van Hoek wrote: [cut] The only difference that MAY be relevant, is that I run a 64-bit version of Windows 7. That is the only deviation that I can think of. Just for reference, I'm running the English 3.2.0 on 64