Dan Lewis wrote:
> On Thursday October 25 2007 08:23 pm, John Meyer wrote:
>> Harold Fuchs wrote:
>>> On 24/10/2007, Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Harold Fuchs wrote:
> woodstracker never saw this because he's not subscribed and you
> didn't include his e-mail address in the To: or
On Thursday October 25 2007 08:23 pm, John Meyer wrote:
> Harold Fuchs wrote:
> > On 24/10/2007, Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Harold Fuchs wrote:
> >>> woodstracker never saw this because he's not subscribed and you
> >>> didn't include his e-mail address in the To: or cc: list of your
>
Harold Fuchs wrote:
> On 24/10/2007, Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Harold Fuchs wrote:
>>
>>> woodstracker never saw this because he's not subscribed and you didn't
>>> include his e-mail address in the To: or cc: list of your message.
>>>
>> How do you know? maybe he's reading it through ne
On 10/24/07, Harold Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> woodstracker never saw this because he's not subscribed and you didn't
> include his e-mail address in the To: or cc: list of your message.
>
> --
Thanks Harold. Realized this after I sent the message and then saw a similar
posting from y
On 24/10/2007, Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Harold Fuchs wrote:
>
> >
> > woodstracker never saw this because he's not subscribed and you didn't
> > include his e-mail address in the To: or cc: list of your message.
> >
>
> How do you know? maybe he's reading it through news.gmane.org - ju
Harold Fuchs wrote:
woodstracker never saw this because he's not subscribed and you didn't
include his e-mail address in the To: or cc: list of your message.
How do you know? maybe he's reading it through news.gmane.org - just
like I am
On 24/10/2007, Alan Boba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/23/07, Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > i am very dissapointed in your program i do not understand the
> program
> > i want my refund
> >
> > If you can't understand Open office then you haven't
