Re: [users] Verify Form Bug in FC6 AMD64 version

2007-01-05 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
Thanks Doug, this helps a lot! Doug Thompson wrote: I shouldn't have been lazy before, but I was also in a hurry. Using 2.0.4 on Suse 10.2 (32-bit), the behavior is identical to what I saw in Win2K. This finding supports your conclusion that it is a FC6 / 64-bit problem. Regards, DougT --

Re: [users] Verify Form Bug in FC6 AMD64 version

2007-01-05 Thread Doug Thompson
Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: > > DougT wrote: >> Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: >>> I use the standard OOo version distributed with FC6 AMD64. The >>> latest version for this distribution is 2.04. >>> >>> I created a simple example form (to answer a user's question). >>> I added a few controls to

Re: [users] Verify Form Bug in FC6 AMD64 version

2007-01-04 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
DougT wrote: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: I use the standard OOo version distributed with FC6 AMD64. The latest version for this distribution is 2.04. I created a simple example form (to answer a user's question). I added a few controls to the form. Usually, I right click on a control and s

Re: [users] Verify Form Bug in FC6 AMD64 version

2007-01-04 Thread DougT
Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: I use the standard OOo version distributed with FC6 AMD64. The latest version for this distribution is 2.04. I created a simple example form (to answer a user's question). I added a few controls to the form. Usually, I right click on a control and select control t

[users] Verify Form Bug in FC6 AMD64 version

2007-01-04 Thread Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
I use the standard OOo version distributed with FC6 AMD64. The latest version for this distribution is 2.04. I created a simple example form (to answer a user's question). I added a few controls to the form. Usually, I right click on a control and select control to open the properties dialog. I