Re: [users] A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection (was Re: Open Office and Vista)

2007-03-07 Thread Tom Chilton
Harold, I appreciate your effort on my behalf however it still is not what one would call a reliable academic (and peer reviewed) source just because it is current hosted on (somebody's personal pages on) an academic institution's webspace. It even refers to itself as "an obscure technica

RE: [users] A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection ( was Re: Open Office and Vista)

2007-03-07 Thread Kurt Buff
EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 14:40 To: users@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [users] A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection (was Re: Open Office and Vista) Harold, I appreciate your effort on my behalf however it still is not what one would call a reliable academic

Re: [users] A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection ( was Re: Open Office and Vista)

2007-03-07 Thread Tom Chilton
that lack of peer review too much. Kurt -Original Message- From: Tom Chilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 14:40 To: users@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [users] A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection (was Re: Open Office and Vista) Harol

Re: [users] A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection (was Re: Open Office and Vista)

2007-03-07 Thread Harold Fuchs
Tom Chilton wrote: PS when an article states: "it's possible that there may be some inaccuracies present" about itself, it is safe to say it cannot be referenced as an academic source for any kind of paper whether it is for an assignment or a journal. Tom, Nothing personal intended ...

Re: [users] A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection (was Re: Open Office and Vista)

2007-03-07 Thread Tom Chilton
Yes I hadn't thought of it that way... point taken. On 7 Mar 2007, at 23:31, Harold Fuchs wrote: Tom Chilton wrote: PS when an article states: "it's possible that there may be some inaccuracies present" about itself, it is safe to say it cannot be referenced as an academic source for any

Re: [users] A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection (was Re: Open Office and Vista)

2007-03-07 Thread josepie
users-unsubscribe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [users] A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection (was Re: Open Office and Vista)

2007-03-08 Thread Tom Chilton
Send a blank email to the address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] not to this list. This information is at the bottom of every email. On 8 Mar 2007, at 01:59, josepie wrote: users-unsubscribe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC

RE: [users] A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection ( was Re: Open Office and Vista)

2007-03-08 Thread Kurt Buff
Get a better supervisor, or apply the cluebat. -Original Message- From: Tom Chilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 15:31 To: users@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [users] A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection ( was Re: Open Office and Vista) You or I