Re: [Users] openvz naming conventions; numeric vs symbolic

2007-08-14 Thread Kir Kolyshkin
See vzctl set --name Steve Wray wrote: > Hi there, > I'm a long time user of Xen virtualisation and have been evaluating > OpenVZ as a replacement for certain applications. > > OpenVZ appears to be technically superior under certain conditions and > I hope to iron out the issues that I have come a

[Users] openvz naming conventions; numeric vs symbolic

2007-08-14 Thread Steve Wray
Hi there, I'm a long time user of Xen virtualisation and have been evaluating OpenVZ as a replacement for certain applications. OpenVZ appears to be technically superior under certain conditions and I hope to iron out the issues that I have come across. The main issue confronting me at this

[Users] Re: dual ethernet woes

2007-08-14 Thread Steve Hodges
On 14/08/2007 7:01 PM, Steve Hodges wrote: The servers I'm trying to put onto a single hardware node each have 2 ethernet interfaces. OK, after extensive testing I have narrowed down what I believe to be the cause of the problem. The VE always seems to chose the first IP address it has bee

Re: [Users] /dev/fd/3

2007-08-14 Thread Steve Hodges
*thank you* The really strange thing is that I'm damn sure I had this working at least once before. I wonder if I managed to snag a different version of the template when I rebuilt the server? Anyway, that's fixed now :-) It still won't mount the dvd, but that's not a huge issue at present

Re: [Users] /dev/fd/3

2007-08-14 Thread Matt Ayres
The same bug exists in Virtuozzo, "ln -s /proc/self/fd /dev/fd" appears to be the fix. Reference: http://www.tektonic.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1936 Steve Hodges wrote: On 14/08/2007 1:58 AM, Gregor Mosheh wrote: Or perhaps your VE has maxed out the number of FDs it's allowed to have? Chec

[Users] dual ethernet woes

2007-08-14 Thread Steve Hodges
The servers I'm trying to put onto a single hardware node each have 2 ethernet interfaces. each server has 2 addresses, e.g. 192.168.206.11 and 192.168.205.11. (these are the primary and secondary networks respectively) There is a DNS server on each network. Each DNS provides resolution on

Re: [Users] /dev/fd/3

2007-08-14 Thread Steve Hodges
On 14/08/2007 1:58 AM, Gregor Mosheh wrote: Or perhaps your VE has maxed out the number of FDs it's allowed to have? Check the /proc/user_beancounters and see if anything there is happening to shed light on whether the failure is VE-related. Here is what I see, including the beancounters imm