I don't quite get it. Is it supposed to be a replacement for vznetaddbr,
an addition to it, or is it orthogonal to it? Who and when calls vznetaddbr?
Dietmar Maurer wrote:
Hi Kir,
Von: Kir Kolyshkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 03. Juli 2008 13:35
An: users@openvz.org;
Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> Just got general protection fault when doing (2.6.24 from git (pve)):
>
> # /etc/init.d/vz stop
> # /etc/init.d/vz start
>
> But i cant reproduce the error anymore.
That's OK.
Please fill a bug in bugzilla.
___
Users mailing lis
Hi there,
Debian uses start-stop-daemon in the init scripts to, for one thing,
stop services.
From the man page:
Note: unless --pidfile is specified, start-stop-daemon behaves similar
to killall(1). start-stop-daemon will scan the process table looking
for any processes which match th
Steve Wray wrote:
Hi there,
Debian uses start-stop-daemon in the init scripts to, for one thing,
stop services.
From the man page:
Note: unless --pidfile is specified, start-stop-daemon behaves similar
to killall(1). start-stop-daemon will scan the process table looking
for any process
> I don't quite get it. Is it supposed to be a replacement for
> vznetaddbr, an addition to it, or is it orthogonal to it? Who
> and when calls vznetaddbr?
It merges vznetaddbr into vznetcfg, making
vznetaddbr obsolete.
- Dietmar
___
Users mailing l
