RE: [Users] BUG: scheduling while atomic

2010-02-03 Thread Cliff Wells
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 08:24 +0100, Dietmar Maurer wrote: -Original Message- From: users-boun...@openvz.org [mailto:users-boun...@openvz.org] On Behalf Of Cliff Wells Sent: Dienstag, 02. Februar 2010 22:28 To: users@openvz.org Subject: [Users] BUG: scheduling while atomic

[Users] BUG: scheduling while atomic

2010-02-02 Thread Cliff Wells
I'm running proxmox 1.4: Linux proxmox1 2.6.24-9-pve #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Nov 17 09:34:41 CET 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux I occasionally get these in syslog, sometimes they come in so fast the machine becomes unresponsive and must be power cycled: Jan 30 13:35:01 proxmox1 /USR/SBIN/CRON[31143]:

Re: [Users] BUG: scheduling while atomic

2010-02-02 Thread Cliff Wells
Thanks much. That was my suspicion. Cliff On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 16:38 -0500, John Drescher wrote: On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:36 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Cliff Wells cl...@develix.com wrote: I'm running proxmox 1.4: Linux proxmox1

Re: [Users] high load average on OpenVZ servers

2009-03-18 Thread Cliff Wells
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 15:12 +0100, Frank wrote: Hi, we are using a couple of OpenVZ servers with 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5.028stab060.2PAE kernel Both have 4 CPU and 16 GB of RAM (they are Dell Servers) One of them have 12 VEs, not CPU intensive, and we are having this load: You don't mention

Re: [Users] memory leak in 2.6.18 ovz kernels

2008-07-01 Thread Cliff Wells
). Currently, running 2.6.24 seems to have fixed it (but I may have to give it longer to see). Regards, Cliff Cliff Wells wrote: Hi, I've been running 2.6.18 releases on two servers and both of them have suffered a slow but steady memory leak. The first server is a dual Athlon MP with 3GB of RAM

[Users] memory leak in 2.6.18 ovz kernels

2008-06-27 Thread Cliff Wells
Hi, I've been running 2.6.18 releases on two servers and both of them have suffered a slow but steady memory leak. The first server is a dual Athlon MP with 3GB of RAM, the second a quad Opteron 275 with 8GB of RAM. I first noticed the issue on the Opteron a few days ago when I realized it was

[Users] rPath or Foresight?

2008-06-12 Thread Cliff Wells
Anyone managed to get one of these to run as a guest? If so, care to share your template? Regards, Cliff ___ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] /etc/sysconfig/vz: No such file or directory

2008-05-24 Thread Cliff Wells
On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 19:39 -0700, Cliff Wells wrote: Host OS: Gentoo x86_64 I was using vzctl from git for a long while but recently started having this error whenever creating a VE: /usr/share/vzpkg/functions: line 233: /etc/sysconfig/vz: No such file or directory Warning: Variable

Re: [Users] Re: time wait bucket table overflow

2008-01-16 Thread Cliff Wells
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 09:35 +0300, vaverin wrote: Hi Cliff, I think network stress testing can create much more time wait buckets. It is information message and not an error therefore IMHO it is not a problem for you. I was concerned because I was seeing odd results during testing (the ab

Re: [Users] 64-bit host, 32-bit guests and iptables

2007-12-22 Thread Cliff Wells
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 18:44 -0800, Cliff Wells wrote: So having gotten my server back up, I'm looking to test out 2.6.24, but I'm a bit confused: I pulled the git tree using: git clone git://git.openvz.org/pub/linux-2.6.24-openvz linux-2.6.24-openvz but when I run make menuconfig

Re: [Users] 64-bit host, 32-bit guests and iptables

2007-12-19 Thread Cliff Wells
VE's setup. I'll give 2.6.24 a try and report back. Thanks, Cliff Cliff Wells wrote: I've heard that there are issues with running iptables commands from a 32-bit guest on a 64-bit host, but I've also seen at least one patch[1] submitted to help resolve this issue. I'm running 2.6.22

Re: [Users] 64-bit host, 32-bit guests and iptables

2007-12-19 Thread Cliff Wells
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 20:46 +0300, Kirill Korotaev wrote: Cliff, moreover, we drop support of 2.6.22 and want to develop 2.6.24 up to really stable (for Ubuntu release). So does this mean 2.6.24 is slated as the replacement for 2.6.18? So will do the best to handle your bug reports ASAP.

Re: [Users] ALERT! /dev/mapper/ubuntu-root does not exist

2007-12-18 Thread Cliff Wells
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 11:15 -0800, Amba Giri wrote: Hello I have installed kernel 2.6.18-ovz-028stab051.1 as the 1st kernel to boot in GRUB. It seemed to boot fine initally but today I find the following error when I boot: Loading,please wait... /scripts/local-top/lvm2: 68: tr: not

Re: [Users] VE fails to stop

2007-12-13 Thread Cliff Wells
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 19:02 +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote: OK, here's what I found concerning ubuntu-7.10 VE vs. OpenVZ. This was fixed in an updated ubuntu templates that I just uploaded to http://download.openvz.org/template/precreated/. These templates are now back to using tmpfs for some

Re: [Users] Re: VE fails to stop

2007-12-12 Thread Cliff Wells
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 10:36 +0300, vaverin wrote: as far as I see even loopback device is not configured. It looks like network service has not been started. Probably some scripts inside your VE hangs and blocks the the following network configuration. IMHO it makes sense to look at 'ps

Re: [Users] Re: Re: VE fails to stop

2007-12-12 Thread Cliff Wells
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 11:54 +0300, kir wrote: The only problem with official ubuntu 7.10 is it comes with upstart, ubuntu replacement for sysvinit. Upstart in VE requires a little change from vzctl to work properly. This will be released soon in vzctl-3.0.20. Actually, I was already

Re: [Users] Re: VE fails to stop

2007-12-11 Thread Cliff Wells
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 16:58 +0300, vaverin wrote: Could You please check that You using init from upstart package? In this case You can work-around this issue by switching to sysvinit For the moment, I deleted the VE in question, but what I'll probably do is use vzctl from git as suggested by

Re: [Users] VE fails to stop

2007-12-11 Thread Cliff Wells
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 19:35 +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote: This is probably a problem with VE start, not stop. VE started badly and can not stop. This is known issue (a bad interaction of Ubuntu's upstart (init replacement) and vzctl) which is fixed in upcoming vzctl release, see

Re: [Users] VE fails to stop

2007-12-10 Thread Cliff Wells
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 17:20 -0800, Cliff Wells wrote: Guest OS: ubuntu-7.10-i386-minimal Does this appear to be a problem with OVZ or with the guest template? Answering my own question: it appears that the template is broken. centos-5-i386-minimal works fine. Cliff