On 06/06/2016 01:51 PM, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
Hi, Volker
On 14:39 Sun 05 Jun , Volker Janzen wrote:
Unfortunately no. We don't support upgrade from pre-release version to the
final one.
When I use a CentOS 7 as base system and install VZ7 afterward it's not
possible to upgrade, too?
There
On 11/18/2015 06:52 PM, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
Den, please comment.
On 21:13 Wed 18 Nov , Corrado Fiore wrote:
Dear All,
as many other people here on the list, I'm watching the development of
Virtuozzo 7 quite closely :-)
One thing I wasn't able to grasp is what storage format KVM-based VMs
VENET device is explicitly NOARP, so this can't be fixed.
pls use VETH
Regards,
Den
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 18:22 +0300, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> Hi!
> On 30 January 2009 12:29:29 Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> > Hi,
> > the problem with DHCP and venet, is that dhcp packets are adressed to
> > 2
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 12:38 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a problem compiling kernel 2.6.26-ovz. I've got it by git clone today,
> ---
> $ git log | head -3
> commit aafb4cebb852b897a594675389328c829e7680ea
> Author: OpenVZ team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed Jul 16 17:20:32 2
guys,
I do think that this is a bug for bugzilla :)
Regards,
Den
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 11:13 +0200, neerd wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Parsing the /proc/self/status does not work with 2.6.24-ovz005 kernel.
> In fact the openvz_host still shows the "EnvID: 0" but there is no
> more "EnvID" into t
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 09:39 +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> > I think the problem is in you routing setup.
>
> I've checked but don't see anything suspicious. The routing setup is very
> simple.
>
> [host:~]# ip rout
I think the problem is in you routing setup.
ip route get
with proper source, destination, incoming interface will help you in
this task.
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 14:15 +0200, Marcus Better wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Marcus Better wrote:
> > IPsec tunnel is correctl
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 17:11 -0400, Zhaohui Wang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If I want to use veth for container networking,do I have to delete venet0?
no, they can co-exist
> If they can exist at the same time, which one is priorer to the other?How the
> packet goes before it get to the physical device
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 09:57 +0200, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> > - broadcasts incoming to a VE are dropped
> are you sure? I have directed broadcasts into VE and have seen them
> arriving to VE...
>
I am pretty sure that packets with destination address other than VE IP
address specified by vzctl c
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 19:26 -0300, Roberto Pereyra wrote:
> Hi all !
>
> Can I use this Virtuozzo howto with Openvz ? Can I configure afp
> firewall in the same way that Virtuozzo ?
I think yes. I do not see a difference :)
Regards,
Den
>
> http://kb.parallels.com/en/875
>
> Thanks in
- broadcasts incoming to a VE are dropped
- outgoing broadcasts gone to the HWN like to the router and not routed
further as usual, so you'll see nothing in eth0. This is normal. The
interface if point-to-point so other VEs do not see this packet.
Regards,
Den
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 16:06
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 17:48 -0400, Zhaohui Wang wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> Can anyone tell me that how to use tcpsndbuf,tcprcvbuf,dgrmbuf to tune the
> container's networking?
>
> What's the unit of such parameters,Bytes or Kbyte,if I changed them to bigger
> or smaller ones,what will happen?
pls
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 22:48 +0930, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Den,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> > you'll have arp replay iff on the _target_ node/VE
> > ip route get 192.168.0.105 from 192.168.0.253 iif
> > will return either a local route or route to a device other than
> > incoming.
>
>
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 15:37 +0930, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have been using OpenVZ for a few months now, and I've been having a
> problem with VE's running for longer then a few days - the hardware
> node ignores ARP queries for VE's that are running on it. The VE has
> IP 192.168
Is this happens in VE0 or inside VE?
If this is a VE, could you check what if the file /etc/mtab is, i.e.
whether it is a regular file or a symlink to /proc/mounts
Regards,
Den
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 07:17 +0100, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just observed a strange problem with
OpenVz should support this configuration.
Do I understand correctly that you seen ICMP echo request in VE2 on eth0
and do not see in eth1? If this is true, you should have some counter
visible via 'netstat -s'.
If this will not help, pls notify me. I will check this in more details.
Regards,
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 10:32 +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>
> Original Message
> Subject: [Users] Networking problem
> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:58:42 +0100
> From: Dean Gostisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: users@openvz.org
> To: users@openvz.org
>
> Hi,
>
> I use Gentoo Ope
17 matches
Mail list logo
