://github.com/Fusl/simfs2ploop just to get an idea how you
can do it with rsync.
On 09/08/2015 03:12 PM, Nick Knutov wrote:
>
> This way takes time. It's definitely not _live_ migration (
>
>
> 08.09.2015 14:00, Kevin Holly [Fusl] ?:
>> Hi!
>
>> You can just d
Is it possible to do live migration between physical disks inside one
> physical node?
>
> I suppose the answer is still no, so the question is what is possible to
> do for this?
>
- --
Best regards
Kevin Holly - r...@hallowe.lt - http://hallowe.lt/
-B
,
>
- --
Best regards
Kevin Holly - r...@hallowe.lt - http://hallowe.lt/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV6aRFAAoJELAaqP3QtzpMBL4H/164pBrZzOIEnxhYWMxegYV8
wBO6jqDaM0iRegwIQScF6pKMEokFqzk6KmWJCuzvCOFAWE2c+LoJ03w0XDsV/jOq
Z4BRWs5BGbzPOuZhTZt405Kfd/HD2hy0ho3LB
s mailing list
> Users@openvz.org
> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
- --
Best regards
Kevin Holly - r...@hallowe.lt - http://hallowe.lt/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVw7/VAAoJELAaqP3QtzpMgUgH/0wVC6nxQOO2yRpULNab15wV
koE3JxY2zrgk0DxVR
such users?
>
> Sergey B.
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@openvz.org
> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
- --
Best regards
Kevin Holly - r...@hallowe.lt - http://hallowe.lt/
-
information on how often that
> information is reset.
>
> Thanks for any assistance.
> ___
> Users mailing list
> Users@openvz.org
> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
- --
Best regards
Kevin Holly - r...@hal
est regards
Kevin Holly - r...@hallowe.lt - http://hallowe.lt/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVm51DAAoJELAaqP3QtzpM+SQIAKHD62bX/ate4SDHYZdQhO/L
NBNFd99Y3rn8L6RLcOMv4aWH3yVDHebvn0P9cft3sDJyx4X/PNHV2W/mmkKIIB8S
Yd8BMxAVOiHIzJKYECXK9EAIrzP/O7aW4F1rmeb5vK42I/8oWWvK8CAlpNc61
uld
forward NDP packets for updating neighbours including routers with the new IPv6
address.
The addresses 2001:1234:1234:1234:: and 2001:1234:1234:1234::1 should now be
reachable from outside.
I hope that I explained this enough in detail so everyone reading should get an
idea of what we mean.
- -
0188 2028 pts/0Ss 16:01 0:00 -bash
> root71 0.0 0.4 17436 1140 pts/0R+ 16:02 0:00 ps aux
>
> And errors on stop, when it try run /run/initctl
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Users mailing list
com/kolyshkin/vzctl/commit/09e974fa3ac9c4abd42194eec8441a40e63ea991
--
Best regards
Kevin Holly - r...@hallowe.lt - http://hallowe.lt/
___
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
d containers and IPv6.
>
> https://openvz.org/Quick_Installation_CentOS_6
> http://openvz.org/Virtual_Ethernet_device https://openvz.org/IPv6
> ___ Users mailing list
> Users@openvz.org https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
- --
--iolimit limits both, read and write. Read and write are combined.
But(!), --iolimit never limits cached read/writes, only direct access
or flushed data/access.
- --
Best regards
Kevin Holly - r...@hallowe.lt - http://hallowe.lt/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gnu
ttp://sprunge.us/bWXV
root@nh1nl:~# df /; df -i /
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/simfs 52428800 607196 51821604 2% /
Filesystem Inodes IUsedIFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/simfs 26214400 21301 261930991% /
Is this a bug in the ploop fi
rate with --nodeps=cpu parameter?
It *might* crash your host node but I never got that far (it usually
just exits with an error message that both CPUs are incompatible and
starts up the suspended container on the source node again).
- --
Best regards
Kevin Holly - r...@hallowe.lt - http://h
# remove all existing snapshots for this container after we're done
for snapid in $(vzctl snapshot-list $CTID -HoUUID); do vzctl
snapshot-delete $CTID --id $snapid; done
- --
Best regards
Kevin Holly - r...@hallowe.lt - http://hallowe.lt/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22
ble_mangle
>
>
> In fact, all the relevant modules are present on the destination
> node AFAICT. What am I missing here?
>
> Thanks, Corrado Fiore
> ___ Users mailing list
> Users@openvz.org https://lists.op
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/07/14 21:45, Kevin Holly wrote:
Oh, and downgrading vzctl to version vzctl-4.6.1-1.x86_64 helped for
now...
- --
Best regards
Kevin Holly - r...@hallowe.lt - http://hallowe.lt/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using
#QcRKRX8DIFdFKJv6ZNFahTSt
And this is the reinstallation process of the container:
https://ezcrypt.it/cg9n#sHQJeiV7Y6bl6zyBBjS60oLN
Where the config looks exactly like this:
https://ezcrypt.it/dg9n#g2Ico8AknpAtJbAcxkbBQDub
- --
Best regards
Kevin Holly - r...@hallowe.lt - http://hallowe.lt/
-BEGIN
and talk with them and lets see
where this goes.
Although, thanks for your help so far.
- --
Best regards
Kevin Holly - r...@hallowe.lt - http://hallowe.lt/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTz1
"ploop info" on the
DiskDescriptor.xml also reports "1k-blocks 229233640" (wrong size).
On 22/07/14 21:27, Kevin Holly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a customer complaining about his filesystem being too small
> (product FS size: 250GB, his FS size: 219GiB / 235G
inux solus-ed-ch01 2.6.32-042stab090.2 #1 SMP Wed May 21 19:25:03 MSK
2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
solus-ed-ch01:~# kcare-uname -a
Linux solus-ed-ch01 2.6.32-042stab092.2 #1 SMP Wed May 21 19:25:03 MSK
2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Thanks in advance for anyone trying to help!
Best
Am 16/06/14 12:28, schrieb Aleksandar Ivanisevic:
> Kir Kolyshkin writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>>
>>> http://openvz.livejournal.com/48634.html
>
> Speaking of ploop send/copy, have you ever thought about a continuous
> ploop send as a way of providing redundancy? In essence, ploop send
> would, instead
> Anyone happen to know why this one vm might be getting a tmpfs instead of
> devtmpfs? or where that setting might be? Its only this one vm, all others on
> the node work without a issue.
>
> Thanks,
>
> ___
> Users mailin
On 08/20/2013 06:23 PM, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
> On 08/20/2013 08:22 AM, Kevin Holly wrote:
>> On 06/11/2013 08:00 PM, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
>>> On 06/11/2013 02:33 AM, Kevin Holly wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> i already had this problem but fo
testfile'? y
rm: cannot remove `testfile': Operation not permitted
root@fwd1:~# chattr -i testfile
root@fwd1:~# rm testfile
rm: remove regular empty file `testfile'? y
root@fwd1:~#
>
>
> 2013/8/20 Kevin Holly <mailto:ope...@lists.dedilink.eu>>
>
> On
On 06/11/2013 08:00 PM, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
> On 06/11/2013 02:33 AM, Kevin Holly wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> i already had this problem but forgot how to fix it:
>>
>> vztmp-Directory contains parts of a 3 month old container, which was
>> destroyed. When i try
26 matches
Mail list logo
