Re: [Users] no such file or directory

2008-12-04 Thread Papp Tamás
Dariush Pietrzak wrote: chroot is not a security mechanism, so when you do this, and the tools you're going to run are compromisied and hostile, then you have just lost control of your HN and all VE's running on it. I think, for debugging it could be OK. tamas

Re: [Users] no such file or directory

2008-12-04 Thread Papp Tamás
Alexander Prinsier wrote: Both these make me think that /bin/ls is corrupt. Can you take a checksum of /bin/ls, and compare it with the /bin/ls of another system running the same distro? The corrupt one is smaller. tamas ___ Users mailing list Us

Re: [Users] no such file or directory

2008-12-04 Thread Papp Tamás
Pongracz Istvan wrote: probably the correct way is: vzctl exec 100 'strace -ff /bin/ls' If the strace exists in the container, it must work. Why shoud I want to run it like this? I know, it's not working in the container and I want to see it outside. Thanks, tamas __

Re: [Users] no such file or directory

2008-12-04 Thread Papp Tamás
Alexander Prinsier wrote: You probably mean "statically linked". /bin/ls usually is dynamically I'm sorry, of course I mean statically linked. linked. At least in any standard distro... Statically linked executables aren't very common. Well, you are right, I'm confused. $ ldd /vz/100/pr

Re: [Users] no such file or directory

2008-12-04 Thread Papp Tamás
Dariush Pietrzak wrote: $ strace -ff /vz/100/root/bin/ls You're trying to run a binary from inside the VE in HN's context? I't dangerous. And it probably doesn't work because ls is linked to something in VE that doesn't exist on HN (try ldd /bin/ls or ldd /vz/100/root/bin/ls) (which would

[Users] no such file or directory

2008-12-04 Thread Papp Tamás
hi! $ strace -ff /vz/100/root/bin/ls execve("/vz/100/root/bin/ls", ["/vz/100/root/bin/ls"], [/* 34 vars */]) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) dup(2) = 3 fcntl(3, F_GETFL) = 0x8002 (flags O_RDWR|O_LARGEFILE) fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|

Re: [Users] vzctl start

2008-08-28 Thread Papp Tamás
Roberto Mello wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Papp Tamás <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: I mounted a /var partition under /vz/100/root, which should contain the /var related files. vzctl start, and I created a test file under it. But

Re: [Users] vzctl start

2008-08-28 Thread Papp Tamás
albinootje wrote: you should use /vz/100/root/ for mounting other things, not /vz/100/private/ OK, I tried it (I'm sorry for the late answer). I mounted a /var partition under /vz/100/root, which should contain the /var related files. vzctl start, and I created a test file under it. But

[Users] vzctl start

2008-08-21 Thread Papp Tamás
hi All, $ vzctl start 100 Starting VE ... vzquota : (error) Quota on syscall for 100: Device or resource busy vzquota on failed [3] $ umount /vz/100/private/tmp $ vzctl start 100 Starting VE ... vzquota : (error) Quota on syscall for 100: Device or resource busy vzquota on failed [3] $ umount