[Users] Re: iptables inside container fails

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 thus Timo Schoeler spake: > Hi list, Replying to myself for the archives: > I'm trying to set up iptables inside a VE (64bit CentOS 5.5, same on the > the HN). Although I followed > > http://wiki.openvz.org/Setting_up_an_iptab

[Users] iptables inside container fails

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I'm trying to set up iptables inside a VE (64bit CentOS 5.5, same on the the HN). Although I followed http://wiki.openvz.org/Setting_up_an_iptables_firewall it fails: [r...@host /]# service iptables start Flushing firewall rules:

Re: [Users] Sharing VLANs between multiple VEs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 thus Chris Bennett spake: | Hi Timo, | |> Thanks for your information; so, you were actually able to use one |> ethN.n in more than one VE at the same time? That's the point it all |> boils down. | | Yup. See below for most of the config you can use a

Re: [Users] Sharing VLANs between multiple VEs

thus Chris Bennett spake: Hi Timo, Hi Chris, AFAICS I can only 'transfer' a single VLAN to a veth, so I could assign eth0.123 to veth101.0. Could I still assign eth.123 to veth102.0 of VE 102, or do I have to do bridging then? I'm not familiar with mapping single interfaces to containers vi

[Users] Sharing VLANs between multiple VEs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I have a scenario that leaves me sitting here, scratching my head wondering whether I need to do some brigding or not: There's my HN having two NICs, on both of them several VLANs are tagged. VLAN123, for example, exists on both interfaces

[Users] MTU on VE's IPv6 interfaces and /proc access

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, although I already read most of the (wiki) documentation and searched around on the net, I still have some questions left. - - Is there a way to increase the MTU of VE's interfaces above the default values? net.ipv6.conf.all.mtu = 1280 net