On 06/15/2012 06:23 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
On 06/13/2012 04:28 PM, Dave Neary wrote:
So - how are you using oVirt? Why did you choose it over alternatives?
What do you like about it? and what would you like to see change,
whether that is in terms of technical, process, or marketing changes?
> >> actually, live snapshot today is only supported for disks, without the
> >> RAM.
> > I can not find the button to create a snapshot for disk only in engine
> > 3.1 beta release. Are you talking about a undergoing project?
>
> live snapshot is for disks only, not for RAM.
> so the live snapsh
On 2012-6-28 10:38, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 06/27/2012 10:29 PM, Shu Ming wrote:
Sorry for confusion here. I attached the snapshot created. I don't think
it is a standalone snapshot for disks(all eight) only. And the usage of
the disk image snapshot should be bound with OS memory snapshot. The
On 06/27/2012 10:29 PM, Shu Ming wrote:
Sorry for confusion here. I attached the snapshot created. I don't think
it is a standalone snapshot for disks(all eight) only. And the usage of
the disk image snapshot should be bound with OS memory snapshot. The
there is currently no OS memory snapshot
On 06/27/2012 09:54 PM, Rami Vaknin wrote:
On 06/28/2012 04:51 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 06/27/2012 09:38 PM, Shu Ming wrote:
On 2012-6-28 9:20, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 06/27/2012 08:57 PM, Shu Ming wrote:
On 2012-6-27 23:30, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
That would make sense only when you are powe
On 06/28/2012 04:51 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 06/27/2012 09:38 PM, Shu Ming wrote:
On 2012-6-28 9:20, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 06/27/2012 08:57 PM, Shu Ming wrote:
On 2012-6-27 23:30, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
That would make sense only when you are powered off, wouldn't it?
Otherwise what's the p
On 06/27/2012 09:38 PM, Shu Ming wrote:
On 2012-6-28 9:20, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 06/27/2012 08:57 PM, Shu Ming wrote:
On 2012-6-27 23:30, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
That would make sense only when you are powered off, wouldn't it?
Otherwise what's the point of disk snapshot with open transactions
On 06/27/2012 09:15 AM, jose garcia wrote:
Good evening to all,
I have added two nodes of Fedora 17 with vdsm 4.10 installed to oVirt
3.1 engine. I was having problems
with SSL, so I have disabled it. When I added the nodes there was no
attempt of installation as it was
the case with oVirt 3.0,
On 2012-6-28 9:20, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 06/27/2012 08:57 PM, Shu Ming wrote:
On 2012-6-27 23:30, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
That would make sense only when you are powered off, wouldn't it?
Otherwise what's the point of disk snapshot with open transactions,
buffers in mem, etc, without saving the
On 06/27/2012 10:47 AM, Winfried de Heiden wrote:
Hi all,
Trying to create an online (vm still running) fails; attachted is de
vdsm logfile trying to create a live snapshot.
Some details:
hypervisor = Fedora 17 + vdsm, all the latest updates etc.
[root@kvm vdsm]# rpm -qi vdsm
Name: v
On 06/27/2012 08:57 PM, Shu Ming wrote:
On 2012-6-27 23:30, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
That would make sense only when you are powered off, wouldn't it?
Otherwise what's the point of disk snapshot with open transactions,
buffers in mem, etc, without saving the state of the VM too?
I understand sy
On 2012-6-27 23:30, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
That would make sense only when you are powered off, wouldn't it?
Otherwise what's the point of disk snapshot with open transactions, buffers in
mem, etc, without saving the state of the VM too?
I understand syncing virtual disk state with the OS cac
On 2012-6-27 23:19, Dafna Ron wrote:
Hi,
no. the snapshot is for the entire vm and it's disks.
On 06/27/2012 05:31 PM, Shu Ming wrote:
Hi,
I am testing oVirt engine 3.1 beta release 06-07. I tried
"snapshots-->create" button for a VM and it looked like that the
snapshot to be created was f
Hi,
no. the snapshot is for the entire vm and it's disks.
On 06/27/2012 05:31 PM, Shu Ming wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am testing oVirt engine 3.1 beta release 06-07. I tried
> "snapshots-->create" button for a VM and it looked like that the
> snapshot to be created was for both the running state of th
Minutes:http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2012/ovirt.2012-06-27-14.00.html
Minutes (text): http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2012/ovirt.2012-06-27-14.00.txt
Log:
http://ovirt.org/meetings/ovirt/2012/ovirt.2012-06-27-14.00.log.html
=
#ovirt: oVirt Weekly Sync
Hi,
I am testing oVirt engine 3.1 beta release 06-07. I tried
"snapshots-->create" button for a VM and it looked like that the
snapshot to be created was for both the running state of the system and
the virtual disks.I am wondering if there is any way to create the
snapshot only for the
On 06/27/2012 04:15 PM, jose garcia wrote:
> Good evening to all,
>
> I have added two nodes of Fedora 17 with vdsm 4.10 installed to oVirt
> 3.1 engine. I was having problems
> with SSL, so I have disabled it. When I added the nodes there was no
> attempt of installation as it was
> the case with
Good evening to all,
I have added two nodes of Fedora 17 with vdsm 4.10 installed to oVirt
3.1 engine. I was having problems
with SSL, so I have disabled it. When I added the nodes there was no
attempt of installation as it was
the case with oVirt 3.0, but the nodes get activated, provided that
The problem still persists.
How do I solve it?
From: users-boun...@ovirt.org [mailto:users-boun...@ovirt.org] On Behalf Of
??
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 2:38 PM
To: 'Robert Middleswarth'
Cc: users@ovirt.org
Subject: Re: [Users] Ovirt and gluster storage (two servers in a cluster)
19 matches
Mail list logo
