Re: [Users] oVirt-3.2 users creating snapshots fail

2013-08-18 Thread Ofri Masad
Hi Karli, First of all, thank you for your feedback. I am not quite sure the thread you are referring to is relevant to the bug you are witnessing. The bug in the thread was fixed only in 3.3 because it was only introduced in 3.3 (the behavior may be the same). anyway, I will try to reproduce

[Users] engine-setup's forcing update

2013-08-18 Thread lof yer
If it detected some updates online, it will force me to choose 'Yes'. If I choose 'No', I'll be 'quitted' Must I update? ___ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Users] engine-setup's forcing update

2013-08-18 Thread Yedidyah Bar David
From: lof yer lof...@gmail.com To: users users@ovirt.org Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 10:46:46 AM Subject: [Users] engine-setup's forcing update If it detected some updates online, it will force me to choose 'Yes'. If I choose 'No', I'll be 'quitted' Must I update? Yes. A simple

Re: [Users] engine-setup's forcing update

2013-08-18 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
- Original Message - From: Yedidyah Bar David d...@redhat.com To: lof yer lof...@gmail.com Cc: users users@ovirt.org Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 10:53:17 AM Subject: Re: [Users] engine-setup's forcing update From: lof yer lof...@gmail.com To: users users@ovirt.org Sent:

Re: [Users] engine-setup's forcing update

2013-08-18 Thread lof yer
thanks, I think it would be better if it was not aborted at this point then. 2013/8/18 Alon Bar-Lev alo...@redhat.com - Original Message - From: Yedidyah Bar David d...@redhat.com To: lof yer lof...@gmail.com Cc: users users@ovirt.org Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 10:53:17 AM

Re: [Users] engine-setup's forcing update

2013-08-18 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
- Original Message - From: lof yer lof...@gmail.com To: Alon Bar-Lev alo...@redhat.com Cc: Yedidyah Bar David d...@redhat.com, users users@ovirt.org Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 11:17:03 AM Subject: Re: [Users] engine-setup's forcing update thanks, I think it would be better if

Re: [Users] Designate Master Storage Domain

2013-08-18 Thread Ayal Baron
- Original Message - Pausing the VM's can work in certain situations for simple maintenance. However suppose the purpose of the storage shutdown is to move data around for certain VM's or perhaps change that particular underlying storage Then why not live migrate the relevant disks?

[Users] 503 error on Engine Login

2013-08-18 Thread Matt .
Hi guys, On a test machine that got a scheduled poweroutage I get a 503 error when I login. I thought about routing because there are two network interfaces but this is not the problem because it even happens when I set one nic to down. The logfiles don't give me information about this error,

Re: [Users] 503 error on Engine Login

2013-08-18 Thread Yedidyah Bar David
From: Matt . yamakasi@gmail.com To: users users@ovirt.org Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 3:01:32 PM Subject: [Users] 503 error on Engine Login Hi guys, On a test machine that got a scheduled poweroutage I get a 503 error when I login. I thought about routing because there are two

Re: [Users] 503 error on Engine Login

2013-08-18 Thread Matt .
I have tried that and most of the time you get a qualified domainname issue, which is not always a problem, the first error actually gives me a bad feeling. Are the IP's also set somewhere in the config files or is this all wildcard ? Starting httpd: httpd: apr_sockaddr_info_get() failed for

Re: [Users] 503 error on Engine Login

2013-08-18 Thread Matt .
Solved, seems to be an issue in the hostsfile of the ovirt engine becaus of the fact that the DNS server was down as a it's a VM too. Thanks! 2013/8/18 Matt . yamakasi@gmail.com I have tried that and most of the time you get a qualified domainname issue, which is not always a problem,

Re: [Users] automatic redirect to home page on 404

2013-08-18 Thread Greg Sheremeta
+1. This is an annoying behavior. Thanks for fixing it. Greg - Original Message - From: Alexander Wels aw...@redhat.com To: users@ovirt.org Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 9:23:13 AM Subject: [Users] automatic redirect to home page on 404 Hi, I have noticed that whenever you

[Users] Remove running Vm's from host

2013-08-18 Thread Matt .
Hi All, Something I have seen before and I'm testing now is that you can have that a host had VM's running when it fails or whatever. The engine thinks and shows that these VM's are still running. When this host is also the SPM, you can have issues that you cannot activate storage and so on.

Re: [Users] Remove running Vm's from host

2013-08-18 Thread Omer Frenkel
- Original Message - From: Matt . yamakasi@gmail.com To: users users@ovirt.org Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 5:04:21 PM Subject: [Users] Remove running Vm's from host Hi All, Something I have seen before and I'm testing now is that you can have that a host had VM's running

Re: [Users] Remove running Vm's from host

2013-08-18 Thread Matt .
I get some errors on this one: # vdsClient 0 list table Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/share/vdsm/vdsClient.py, line 2457, in module code, message = commands[command][0](commandArgs) File /usr/share/vdsm/vdsClient.py, line 287, in do_list response =

Re: [Users] Remove running Vm's from host

2013-08-18 Thread Matt .
Also a DNS issue for the last error, so added the hostnames in the hosts file again and I get this now: Connection to kvm-02.domain.local:54321 refused 2013/8/18 Matt . yamakasi@gmail.com I get some errors on this one: # vdsClient 0 list table Traceback (most recent call last): File

Re: [Users] Remove running Vm's from host

2013-08-18 Thread Matt .
Still that odd bug that fills the vdsm.log... Working now again since vdsm didn't start 2013/8/18 Matt . yamakasi@gmail.com Also a DNS issue for the last error, so added the hostnames in the hosts file again and I get this now: Connection to kvm-02.domain.local:54321 refused

Re: [Users] oVirt-3.2 users creating snapshots fail

2013-08-18 Thread Karli Sjöberg
sön 2013-08-18 klockan 03:01 -0400 skrev Ofri Masad: Hi Karli, First of all, thank you for your feedback. I am not quite sure the thread you are referring to is relevant to the bug you are witnessing. The bug in the thread was fixed only in 3.3 because it was only introduced in 3.3 (the