On 11/24/2013 01:57 AM, i iordanov wrote:
Hey,
I actually realized that something I wrote is inaccurate.
UserB, who was not granted permission to any VM was actually able to
connect to a freshly booted UserA's VM. Subsequently, UserA was unable to
connect to his own VM anymore, and the
On 11/23/2013 07:44 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
Itamar Heim wrote:
well, no. 3.3 isn't tested/packaged for f20.
just wondering, if you're looking to avoid os upgrades, rather than keen
on latest, why fedora over centos/rhel as engine/nodes?
Being on a current kernel in the hypervisor just
On 11/24/2013 05:19 AM, Bob Doolittle wrote:
Agreed. Many of us already have an existing directory of ISOs which is
NFS-shared, (I created mine while using VirtualBox for several years)
and would simply like to use it.
This is an issue which is on the To-Do list, but unfortunately didn't
make
Hi Juan,
Thanks for your suggestions!
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Juan Hernandez jhern...@redhat.com wrote:
Here you are experiencing two security features of the engine. The first
one is the multiple level administration (a.k.a. MLA). The engine
organizes objets in hierarchy: a set of
On Nov 24, 2013 5:08 PM, i iordanov iiorda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Juan,
Thanks for your suggestions!
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Juan Hernandez jhern...@redhat.com
wrote:
Here you are experiencing two security features of the engine. The first
one is the multiple level administration
Hi Itamar,
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Itamar Heim itam...@gmail.com wrote:
You probably added the user role to the user from the users tab, rather
than just adding at vm level . You don't need to add the user first.
This was the misunderstanding that I had. I thought I have to add the
Von: Itamar Heim [ih...@redhat.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. November 2013 11:54
An: Markus Stockhausen; users@ovirt.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [Users] Fedora 20
Being on a current kernel in the hypervisor just gives a better
feeling in a 10GBit NFS environment. That comes from several
Hey,
- Original Message -
From: Nicholas Kesick cybertimber2...@hotmail.com
To: oVirt Mailing List users@ovirt.org
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 6:55:23 PM
Subject: [Users] Trouble Upgrading (Fedora)
I am having trouble upgrading on Fedora 19 to 3.3.1.
Two observations:
1) I
On 11/24/2013 06:28 PM, Markus Stockhausen wrote:
Von: Itamar Heim [ih...@redhat.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. November 2013 11:54
An: Markus Stockhausen; users@ovirt.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [Users] Fedora 20
Being on a current kernel in the hypervisor just gives a better
feeling in a 10GBit NFS
Hi,
Trying to upgrade from 3.1 to 3.3 and am running engine-setup, but it’s bombing
at the following:
[ INFO ] Stage: Setup validation
During execution engine service will be stopped (OK, Cancel) [OK]:
[ ERROR ] Failed to execute stage 'Setup validation': Cannot get JAVA_HOME ([])
Ended up installing openjdk1.7 and the error went away. Noticed some entries
in the scripts that looked for 1.7 specifically…
From: Karl k...@utropicmedia.commailto:k...@utropicmedia.com
Date: Sunday, November 24, 2013 at 9:30 PM
To: users@ovirt.orgmailto:users@ovirt.org
Hello everybody,
One of the upcoming network features for oVirt 3.4 is Host Network QoS,
i.e. being to configure Quality of Service over networks attached to
hosts' interfaces. The primary motivation is to be able to cap traffic
related to specific networks, so that other networks residing on the
12 matches
Mail list logo
