Re: [ovirt-users] Upgrade patch 3.5 -> 3.6

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Николаев Алексей wrote: > You must not configure firewall in backup restore procedure. Because EL6 > backup uses iptables instead EL7 fresh install uses firewalld. Thanks for pointing that out! Does this mean you actually tried this and that was the only issue?

Re: [ovirt-users] question mark in oVirt - "cannot acquire state change lock"

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:58 PM, p...@email.cz wrote: > Hello all, > how can I eliminate question mark from "hanged" VM? ( it happened in > shutdown process via oVirt env. ) > Best solution without hypervizor reboot, meaning "power off" , "kill" or > another workaround for that VM . > Will help r

Re: [ovirt-users] Upgrade patch 3.5 -> 3.6

  16.02.2016, 16:31, "Alexander Wels" :On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 12:36:58 PM Johan Kooijman wrote: Ack, thx. On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Yedidyah Bar David  wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Johan Kooijman  >  > wrote: > > Didi, > >  > > O

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt and gluster storage domain HA testing

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Sahina Bose wrote: > > > On 02/17/2016 05:08 AM, Bill James wrote: >> >> I have a ovirt cluster with and system running ovirt-engine 3.6.2.6-1 on >> centos7.2 >> and 3 hardware nodes running glusterfs 3.7.6-1 and centos7.2. >> I created a gluster volume using glust

Re: [ovirt-users] UCS Integration (vmfex/SRIOV)

HI David) If everything configured properly on your UCS side and you have a working Port Profile id/name your next steps should be: 1) Run for example: engine-config -s CustomDeviceProperties="{type=interface;prop={ifacemacspoof=^(true|false)$;queues=[1-9][0-9]*;vmfex=^[a-zA-Z0-9_.-]{2,32}$;Sec

Re: [ovirt-users] ovirt and gluster storage domain HA testing

On 02/17/2016 05:08 AM, Bill James wrote: I have a ovirt cluster with and system running ovirt-engine 3.6.2.6-1 on centos7.2 and 3 hardware nodes running glusterfs 3.7.6-1 and centos7.2. I created a gluster volume using gluster cli and then went to add a storage domain. I created it with Pa

[ovirt-users] UCS Integration (vmfex/SRIOV)

Hey All, I've got a test instance and would like to get vmfex working. I'm very new to ovirt, so some of the basics are still new to me. I currently have a 3 node setup which are all configured without vmfex, what I'd like to do is convert the hosts one by one to use vmfex. >From the UCS side

Re: [ovirt-users] Can't remove snapshot

Thank Greg, My problem was resolved. 2016-02-16 20:07 GMT-03:00 Greg Padgett : > On 02/16/2016 05:51 PM, Marcelo Leandro wrote: >> >> Hello Greg, >> I not see disk image at the storage: >> >> [root@srv-qemu01 ~]# cd >> >> /rhev/data-center/77e24b20-9d21-4952-a089-3c5c592b4e6d/c2dc0101-748e-4a7b-9

[ovirt-users] ovirt and gluster storage domain HA testing

I have a ovirt cluster with and system running ovirt-engine 3.6.2.6-1 on centos7.2 and 3 hardware nodes running glusterfs 3.7.6-1 and centos7.2. I created a gluster volume using gluster cli and then went to add a storage domain. I created it with Path ovirt1-ks.test:/gv1 and all works fine, un

Re: [ovirt-users] Can't remove snapshot

On 02/16/2016 05:51 PM, Marcelo Leandro wrote: Hello Greg, I not see disk image at the storage: [root@srv-qemu01 ~]# cd /rhev/data-center/77e24b20-9d21-4952-a089-3c5c592b4e6d/c2dc0101-748e-4a7b-9913-47993eaa52bd/images/b7a27d0c-57cc-490e-a3f8-b4981310a9b0/ [root@srv-qemu01 b7a27d0c-57cc-490e-a3f

Re: [ovirt-users] Can't remove snapshot

Hello Greg, I not see disk image at the storage: [root@srv-qemu01 ~]# cd /rhev/data-center/77e24b20-9d21-4952-a089-3c5c592b4e6d/c2dc0101-748e-4a7b-9913-47993eaa52bd/images/b7a27d0c-57cc-490e-a3f8-b4981310a9b0/ [root@srv-qemu01 b7a27d0c-57cc-490e-a3f8-b4981310a9b0]# ls 2e59f7f2-9e30-460e-836a-5e0d3

Re: [ovirt-users] "bridge port" error when setting up hosted-engine on 2nd oVirt 3.6.2 node

I've got the same problem on the second hosted engine server. When you say available in tomorrows build, when will that be available for yum update using the ovirt36-pre repository? Darryl From: users-boun...@ovirt.org on behalf of Simone Tiraboschi Sent: Tu

Re: [ovirt-users] Can't remove snapshot

On 02/16/2016 08:50 AM, Rik Theys wrote: Hi, I'm trying to determine the correct "bad_img" uuid in my case. The VM has two snapshots: * The "Active VM" snapshot which has a disk that has an actual size that's 5GB larger than the virtual size. It has a creation date that matches the timestamp a

Re: [ovirt-users] Can't remove snapshot

On 02/16/2016 07:10 AM, Marcelo Leandro wrote: Hello, I have the same problem, i tried delete snapshot but it did not success, the status snapshot as illegal , look the engine.log follow you can see the messages error: Hi Marcelo, The problem in your log, error = Drive image file could not

[ovirt-users] question mark in oVirt - "cannot acquire state change lock"

Hello all, how can I eliminate question mark from "hanged" VM? ( it happened in shutdown process via oVirt env. ) Best solution without hypervizor reboot, meaning "power off" , "kill" or another workaround for that VM . Will help removing task DB record from oVirt mgmt server - if exists , ofco

Re: [ovirt-users] lvm_dev_whitelist vdsm.conf option

On 16/02/16 13:46 +0100, Johannes Tiefenbacher wrote: On 2016-02-15 17:05, jojo wrote: On 2016-02-15 16:09, Adam Litke wrote: On 11/02/16 17:22 +0100, Johannes Tiefenbacher wrote: Hi, I am wondering what the lvm_dev_whitelist vdsm.conf option is for? I had some issues whith vdsm switching off

Re: [ovirt-users] Can't remove snapshot

Hi, I'm trying to determine the correct "bad_img" uuid in my case. The VM has two snapshots: * The "Active VM" snapshot which has a disk that has an actual size that's 5GB larger than the virtual size. It has a creation date that matches the timestamp at which I created the second snapshot. The

Re: [ovirt-users] Upgrade patch 3.5 -> 3.6

On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 12:36:58 PM Johan Kooijman wrote: > Ack, thx. > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Yedidyah Bar David > > wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Johan Kooijman > > > > wrote: > > > Didi, > > > > > > Ok, the piece of information on engine still supported on

Re: [ovirt-users] Can't remove snapshot

Hi Greg, > > 2016-02-09 21:30 GMT-03:00 Greg Padgett : >> On 02/09/2016 06:08 AM, Michal Skrivanek wrote: >>> >>> On 03 Feb 2016, at 10:37, Rik Theys wrote: > I can see the snapshot in the "Disk snapshot" tab of the storage. It has > a status of "illegal". Is it OK to (try to) remo

[ovirt-users] Manually assign DC and Cluster to Blank template

Hi, We upgraded from oVirt 3.5 and 3.6 and deleted the Default cluster, so now we have the Blank template with no DC and no Cluster, thus our users can't use it. Is there a way to manually set these two parameters to the current DC and Cluster values for the Blank template? I tried editing i

Re: [ovirt-users] lvm_dev_whitelist vdsm.conf option

On 2016-02-15 17:05, jojo wrote: On 2016-02-15 16:09, Adam Litke wrote: On 11/02/16 17:22 +0100, Johannes Tiefenbacher wrote: Hi, I am wondering what the lvm_dev_whitelist vdsm.conf option is for? I had some issues whith vdsm switching off logical volumes that it better should keep it's hands

Re: [ovirt-users] Can't remove snapshot

Hello, I have the same problem, i tried delete snapshot but it did not success, the status snapshot as illegal , look the engine.log follow you can see the messages error: 2016-02-16 08:46:20,059 INFO [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.RemoveSnapshotCommandCallback] (DefaultQuartzScheduler_Worker-57) [

Re: [ovirt-users] Upgrade patch 3.5 -> 3.6

Ack, thx. On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Yedidyah Bar David wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Johan Kooijman > wrote: > > Didi, > > > > Ok, the piece of information on engine still supported on 3.6 was > unknown to > > me. Makes my job a lot easier. > > > > What would be the recomme

Re: [ovirt-users] Upgrade patch 3.5 -> 3.6

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Johan Kooijman wrote: > Didi, > > Ok, the piece of information on engine still supported on 3.6 was unknown to > me. Makes my job a lot easier. > > What would be the recommended path: first upgrade the nodes to 3.6 and then > the engine? Or the other way around?

Re: [ovirt-users] How does VDSM-Fake actually work?

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Michal Skrivanek < michal.skriva...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 09 Feb 2016, at 12:15, Nicolás wrote: > > Is there a way to get an account on mojo.redhat.com or is it internal? > I'm trying to open the document but credentials are required and I see no > option to

Re: [ovirt-users] Upgrade patch 3.5 -> 3.6

Didi, Ok, the piece of information on engine still supported on 3.6 was unknown to me. Makes my job a lot easier. What would be the recommended path: first upgrade the nodes to 3.6 and then the engine? Or the other way around? On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Yedidyah Bar David wrote: > On Tue

Re: [ovirt-users] [FC22] ovirt-engine-reports missing in 3.6 repos

Ok, thank you both for the information, I will explore the possibility of using another server for the reports. It may be useful for other if this is mentioned on the web (Fedora is the first suggestion I've seen everywhere in the documentation) El 2016-02-14 14:46, Yaniv Dary escribió: > You

[ovirt-users] [Node] Maintenance mode and update

Hello, I am concerned about maintenance mode and system updates. In which case it is essential to put host in maintenance mode? No worries for Content Updates requiring a reboot. But for example in the case of updates like VDSM* or kvm it seems essential, but is it? -- Lionel _