On 04/18/2017 08:09 AM, Rafał Wojciechowski wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> I made comparison(+diff) between xml passing through vdsm which is
> working and another one which cause libvirtd segfault
>
> https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/eqpe8Byu2l-3SRdXc6LTLl5M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE=
>
>
> I am not sure i
Hi,
There is a wiki page for importing VMs from other hypervisors here:
https://www.ovirt.org/develop/release-management/features/virt/virt-v2v-integration/
and specific for KVM from Libvirt the wiki page is in progress but you can
read about it here:
https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-site/pull/876/f
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Leni Kadali Mutungi
wrote:
>>> I think that all of them are maintained on gerrit.ovirt.org, and most
>>> have
>>> mirrors on github.com/ovirt.
>>>
> Found all the source code on gerrit.ovirt.org; not all of it is
> mirrored to github.com/ovirt
>
>>> If you haven't
hello,
I made comparison(+diff) between xml passing through vdsm which is
working and another one which cause libvirtd segfault
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/eqpe8Byu2l-3SRdXc6LTLl5M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE=
I am not sure if below setting are fine but I dont know how to change them
(I
@gianlucca yes you are right that would have worked definitely...because a
prerequisite for removing a storage domain is having another say nfs or
iscsi as the master then decommissioning the old onei opted for the
longer route of deleting the data center, since I am also still testing the
plat
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 4:03 PM, martin chamambo
wrote:
> I had issues with my master data storage domain and the only way was to
> set the hosts in maintenence mode ,delete the datacenter so i can recreate
> it
>
> I managed to delete the datacenter and the storage domains , and created a
>
Nir,
A process can chdir into mount point and then lazy umount it. Filesystem
remains mounted while the process exists and current directory is on mounted
filesystem.
# struncate -s 1g masterfs.img
# mkfs.ext4 masterfs.img
# mkdir masterfs
# mount -o loop masterfs.img masterfs
# cd masterfs
# u
hello,
I extracted xml from /var/log/core for some test VM and tried to validy
via virt-xml-validate
maybe it could help in this case
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/F878jO-16OEQZAQX0imQx15M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE=
Regards,
Rafal Wojciechowski
hi,
I will add few informations:
currently
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 6:54 PM Adam Litke wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Pavel Gashev wrote:
>
>> Adam,
>>
>>
>>
>> You know, Sanlock has recovery mechanism that kills VDSM, or even
>> triggers Watchdog to reboot SPM host in case it has lost the SPM lock.
>>
>> I’m asking because I
Sorry for the CAPS...
On Apr 17, 2017 6:53 PM, "Gianluca Cecchi"
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> What's the problem with your keyboard while typing your emails' subject?
> Only a fact of being an Easter present and not yet acquainted..?
> It sounds like a cry and doesn't set one to reply better or sooner...
___
Hi,
What's the problem with your keyboard while typing your emails' subject?
Only a fact of being an Easter present and not yet acquainted..?
It sounds like a cry and doesn't set one to reply better or sooner...
___
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http
[+gluster-users]
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Sandro Bonazzola
wrote:
> Hi,
> a few weeks ago I opened a survey asking oVirt users about how they use
> oVirt.
> Here are the analytics of the survey:
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1s3k4pq_U4vHTuUUKr6dOosGj_
> EGFxqEisansHlqnyyM/viewanalyti
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Pavel Gashev wrote:
> Adam,
>
>
>
> You know, Sanlock has recovery mechanism that kills VDSM, or even triggers
> Watchdog to reboot SPM host in case it has lost the SPM lock.
>
> I’m asking because I had issues with my master storage that caused SPM
> host to reb
Adam,
You know, Sanlock has recovery mechanism that kills VDSM, or even triggers
Watchdog to reboot SPM host in case it has lost the SPM lock.
I’m asking because I had issues with my master storage that caused SPM host to
reboot by Watchdog. And I was sure that it’s an intended behaviour. Isn’t
Thats a far fetched solution koz a lot of iscsi connections are IP:3260 but
will definitely look into that regardless i ran into another issue when
i deleted the storage domains...so this will be for another time
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Konstantin Raskoshnyi
wrote:
> I didn't try, b
I didn't try, but should work https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3721.txt
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 7:32 AM martin chamambo wrote:
> @Konstantin
>
> ISCSI doesnt work with FQDN ,if i remember correctly , when you discover
> your LUNs ,it will be in the form of X.X.X.X:3260 ?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Pavel Gashev wrote:
> Nir,
>
>
>
> Isn’t SPM managed via Sanlock? I believe there is no need to fence SPM
> host. Especially if there are no SPM tasks running.
>
It's true that the exclusivity of the SPM role is enforced by Sanlock but
you always need to fence a
@Konstantin
ISCSI doesnt work with FQDN ,if i remember correctly , when you discover
your LUNs ,it will be in the form of X.X.X.X:3260 ?
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Konstantin Raskoshnyi
wrote:
> Use fqdn instead of IP address.
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 6:38 AM martin chamambo
> wro
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 9:12 AM, FERNANDO FREDIANI <
fernando.fredi...@upx.com> wrote:
> Should I understand then that fecing is not mandatory, just advised and
> there are no downtimes to the rest of the cluster if a pending manual
> action has to be done to confirm a host has been rebooted in or
Use fqdn instead of IP address.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 6:38 AM martin chamambo wrote:
> JUST CANT UNDERSTAND WHY OVIRT DOESNT HAVE A WEB-GUI FOR EDITING ,REMOVING
> UNWANTED STORAGE DOMAINS
>
> I configured openfiler as my iscsi storage and while i am able to connect
> to it i wanted to cha
Hi Nir,
BMC - board management controller, in my case I have ilo.
Yes I set up power management for all hosts - ovirt sees ilo status as ok.
I use remote pdu to shutdown the port, after that happens the picture I
attached.
After I switch power port on, ovirt is able to read ilo status, sees that
Li
Hello.
I have a Engine which is hosted in a optimal location for the people who
access it and this Engine manage multiple Datacenters, some close by and
some far away in terms of latency.
What is the maximum latency advised between the Engine and the hosts for
a healthy operation or that doe
I had issues with my master data storage domain and the only way was to set
the hosts in maintenence mode ,delete the datacenter so i can recreate
it
I managed to delete the datacenter and the storage domains , and created a
new datacenter , but now the existing clusters are not part of a data
JUST CANT UNDERSTAND WHY OVIRT DOESNT HAVE A WEB-GUI FOR EDITING ,REMOVING
UNWANTED STORAGE DOMAINS
I configured openfiler as my iscsi storage and while i am able to connect
to it i wanted to change the IP address of the connecting IP to one of
the logical networks which i disignated as a STOR
Nir,
Isn’t SPM managed via Sanlock? I believe there is no need to fence SPM host.
Especially if there are no SPM tasks running.
From: on behalf of Nir Soffer
Date: Monday, 17 April 2017 at 16:06
To: Konstantin Raskoshnyi , Dan Yasny
Cc: users , FERNANDO FREDIANI
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] s
Should I understand then that fecing is not mandatory, just advised and
there are no downtimes to the rest of the cluster if a pending manual
action has to be done to confirm a host has been rebooted in order to
move the SPM to another live host. Perhaps only effect is not be able to
add new ho
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 8:24 AM Konstantin Raskoshnyi
wrote:
> But actually, it didn't work well. After main SPM host went down I see this
> [image: Screen Shot 2017-04-16 at 10.22.00 PM.png]
>
> 2017-04-17 05:23:15,554Z ERROR
> [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.irsbroker.IrsProxy]
> (DefaultQuart
On Friday, April 14, 2017 9:38:23 AM EDT Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Adding Martin
>
That exception is telling you it can't run the queries needed to populate the
dashboard. Highly likely you don't have the DWH properly installed/configured.
That still shouldn't give you just a blank page, the co
If this works in this way then it's a huge downside in the architecture.
Perhaps someone can clarify in more details.
Fernando
On 15/04/2017 14:53, Konstantin Raskoshnyi wrote:
Hi Fernando,
I see each host has direct connection nfs mount, but yes, if main host
to which I connected nfs storag
29 matches
Mail list logo
